Reclaiming Motion By Paul Vincent Kelly For Judicial Review Of A Decision Of The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Judge | Lord Justice Clerk,Lord Woolman,Lord Doherty |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] CSIH 57 |
| Date | 18 October 2021 |
| Docket Number | P914/20 |
| Court | Court of Session |
| Published date | 18 October 2021 |
SECOND DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION
[2021] CSIH 57
P914/20
Lord Justice Clerk
Lord Woolman
Lord Doherty
OPINION OF THE COURT
delivered by LADY DORRIAN, the LORD JUSTICE CLERK
in the Reclaiming Motion
by
PAUL VINCENT KELLY
Petitioner and Reclaimer
for
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE SCOTTISH CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW
COMMISSION
Petitioner and Reclaimer: Dewar QC; Paterson Bell (for McKennas, Soli citors, Glenrothes)
Respondents: Pirie; Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
19 October 2021
Introduction
[1] In July 2016 at the High Court in Glasgow, the reclaimer was convicted of six charges
of historic sexual assault and one of assault. He asked the respondents (‘the SCCRC’) to
refer his case to the High Court for an appeal on the basis of defective representation. It
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 cases
-
Kelly v Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
... [2021] CSIH 57 Second Division Lord Arthurson No Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission Cases referred to: AJE v HM Advocate 2002 JC 215; 2002 SLT 715; 2002 SCCR 341 Anderson v HM Advocate 1996 JC 29; 1996 SLT 155; 1996 SCCR 114 Ditta v HM Advocate 2002 SCCR 891; 2002 GWD 28-963 Grant v......