Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Redgrave v Hurd

Cited authorities 3 Cited in 220 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1881
Date1881
Year1881
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
174 cases
  • Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (No. 4) (Reduction of Damages)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 Julio 2000
    ..."the 1945 Act provides the means of reflecting this division of responsibility in the award of damages". 37 The second issue is whether Redgrave v. Hurd is authority for a rule of law that contributory negligence (or intention) can never be a defence in a claim for damages for the tort of d......
  • Alliance & Leicester Building Society v Edgestop Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Gran Gelato Ltd v Richcliff (Group) Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 10 Diciembre 1991
    ... ... 878F–G , H–879B , 880H , 881D , F ) ... Redgrave v. Hurd ( 1881 ) 20 Ch.D. 1 , C.A. and Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v. Butcher [ 1989 ] A.C. 852 , H.L.(E.) applied ... The ... ...
  • Laurence v Lexcourt Holdings Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 1137C–F ) ... In re Davis & Cavey ( 1883 ) 40 Ch.D. 601 ; Charles Hunt Ltd. v. Palmer [ 1931 ] 2 Ch. 287 and Redgrave v. Hurd ( 1881 ) 20 Ch.D. 1 , C.A. applied ... (2) That there had been a common mistake between the parties the the agreement was made ... ...
    • Request a trial to view additional results
13 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Partnership and LLP Law - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 Agosto 2018
    ...Bank Ltd v National Anti-Vivisection Society Ltd [1972] Ch 526, [1971] 3 WLR 321, [1971] 3 All ER 401, ChD 9 Redgrave v Hurd (1881–2) 20 Ch D 1, 57 LJ Ch 113, 30 WR 251, CA 138 Reed (Inspector of Taxes) v Young [1986] 1 WLR 649, [1986] STC 285, 59 TC 196, HL 108 Rees v Dartnall [2009] EWHC ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • 21 Junio 2014
    ...25 CCLT (3d) 306, [2004] BCJ No 762, 2004 BCSC 510 ........................................................... 225 Redgrave v Hurd (1881), 20 ChD 1, 57 LJ Ch 113, 30 WWR 251, [1881–85] All ER Rep 77 (CA) ................................................. 303 Redican v Nesbitt (1923), [1924] ......
  • VITIATING FACTORS IN CONTRACT LAW — THE INTERACTION OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1998, December 1998
    • 1 Diciembre 1998
    ...de Chile v Sogemin Metals Ltd[1997] 1 WLR 1396. 103 See the Contributory Negligence and Personal Injuries Act (Cap 54, 1989 Rev Ed). 104 (1881) 20 ChD 1. 105 [1994] 2 All ER 38 at 50—51. 106 See generally ibid at 51—53. 107 See supra, note 95. 108 [1992] 1 All ER 865; briefly discussed infr......
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Partnership and LLP Law - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 Agosto 2018
    ...misconduct of a partner has jeopardised partnership assets and destroyed the relationship of mutual trust; 37 34 Redgrave v Hurd (1881–2) 20 Ch D 1. 35 Sichel v Mosenthal (1862) 30 Beav 371, 54 ER 932. 36 Sobell v Boston [1975] 1 WLR 1587. 37 Sheppard v Oxenford (1855) 1 K & J 491, 69 ER 55......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT