Redmond-Bate v DPP
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 23 July 1999 |
| Date | 23 July 1999 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
61 cases
-
Morse v The Police Sc
... ... 63 R (Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary [2006] UKHL 55 , [2007] 2 AC 105 at [96]–[97] per Lord Carswell. See also Nicol v Director of Public Prosecutions [1996] Crim LR 318 (QB ) per Simon Brown LJ and Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions [1999] Crim LR 998(QB) per Sedley LJ ... 64 As to which see the discussion in Brooker at [4] ... 65 As Arnold J in the Court of Appeal thought necessary: at [21] and [27] he emphasised that the “reasonable persons” are the same type of people as ... ...
-
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty
...and freedom of assembly and association, constitute rights jealously safeguarded by English law. As Sedley LJ put it in Redmund-Bate v DPP 7 BHRC 375 at pp 382–3: “Free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome ......
-
Mr S Thomas v Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and Ms A Brett: 2304056/2018
...defined exceptions laid down by common law or statute.” 3. Also much quoted are the words of Sedley LJ in Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions (1999) 7 BHRC 375, [20]: “Free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical,......
-
R (Ghai) v Newcastle upon Tyne City Council
... ... The claimant is a man of peace and does not wish to cause provocation. If there were public order problems the authorities could intervene and ultimately arrest those committing a breach of the peace (citing Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions [1999] EWHC Admin 732 ; [2007] HRLR 249 , at [18], per Sedley LJ). The exercise of the claimant's right to have a Hindu cremation would not clash with the rights of persons who chose not to have an open air funeral pyre; their rights would not be disrespected ... ...
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
Allowing Free Speech and Prohibiting Persecution—A Contemporary Sophie's Choice
...is available online at the DCA ‘Human Rights’webpage www.dca.gov.uk/hract/hrafaqs.htm, accessed 14 May 2006.16 Redmond-Bate vDPP [2000] HRLR 249 at 260, per Sedley LJ.17 Ibid. at 249.18 The appeal was heard in mid–1999, the Human Rights Act 1998 came into force inUK law on 2 October 2000.19......
-
Protest Before and During a Pandemic
...v Jones [1936] 1 KB 218, 222, Lord Hewart CJ described Beatty v Gillbanks as a ‘somewhat unsatisfactorycase’.56. In Redmond-Bate v DPP (1999) 163 JP 789, Sedley LJ said that he did not understand why Lord Hewart CJ thoughtBeatty v Gillbanks ‘somewhat unsatisfactory’, and that Duncan v Jones......
-
Divisional Court
...Article 10 of The Convention. The balancing act to be doneby the courts is made ever more complex by the judgment in Redmond-Bate v DPP (1999) 163 JP 789, [1999] Crim LR 998, where Sedley LJ heldthat the right to freedom of speech enshrined in Article 10 of theConvention is not confined to ......
-
Undesirable Posters and Dubious Symbols: Anglo-German Legal Solutions to the Display of Right-Wing Symbolism and Propaganda
...Intention in Adjudication under theHuman Rights Act 1998’ (2006) 26(1) OJLS 179.44 Human Rights Act 1998, s. 3.45 Redmond-Bate v DPP [2000] HRLR 249.46 For a full discussion on common law breach of the peace and its evolution overtime, see Thornton et al., above n. 8 at 6.125.47 Redmond-Bat......
Get Started for Free