Reed and Bull Information Systems Ltd v Steadman
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
69 cases
-
Mrs S Smith v Karen Cullen and Rhonda Reid T/a Craigend Out of School Care: 4123823/2018
...the claimant’s dignity. He submitted that lack of intent is not a defence, relying on Reed and Bull Information Systems Ltd v Steedman [1999] IRLR 299 EAT In respect of the indirect discrimination claim, the claimant’s representative submitted that the respondent’s evidence and bank stateme......
-
Ms M Hamilton v Fife Council: 4104090/2016 and 4106953/2017
...to have the said effect of (objectively considered). 298. A one off incident can constitute harassment (Reid and another v Stedman [1999] IRLR 299. 25 299. Some conduct may, by its nature, be presumed to be unwanted unless proved otherwise (Code of Conduct para 7.8). The term and concept of......
-
R (Equal Opportunities Commission) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
...of having to determine whether a claimed perception was genuine. " 33 Miss Rose had relied upon dicta of Morison P in Reed & Bull Information Systems Ltd v Steadman [1999] IRLR 299, which supported the proposition of an objective test. However, even in that judgment, he made it clear that ......
-
Ms Z Hilton-Webb v Minis Childcare Ltd: 2304382/2019
...not be found to have done so.” 363. We were also assisted by the referral to the Employment Appeal Tribunal case of Reed v Stedman [1999] IRLR 299, EAT and in particular the quote from paragraph 28 of the “…it is for each individual to determine what they find unwelcome or offensive, there ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Sexual Harassment In The Workplace: What Scottish Companies Need To Know
...nature. An employee does not have to have previously objected to a person’s conduct for it to be considered unwanted (Reed v Stedman [1999] IRLR 299 EAT) and the fact that an employee may have tolerated [SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE] 10 10 ILN Labor & Employment Group – Sexual Harassm......
2 books & journal articles
-
Employers' Liability at Common Law: Two Competing Paradigms
...ICR 833 (race discrimination); Meikle v Nottinghamshire County Council [2004] 4 All ER 97 (disability discrimination); Reed v Stedman [1999] IRLR 299 (sexual harassment). the exercise of discretions in relation to employee remuneration,1212Clark v Nomura International plc [2000] IRLR 766; H......
-
A quantitative and qualitative analysis of sexual harassment claims 1995–2005
...(Samuels, 2004: 474).However, a more enlightened approach is arguably adopted by the EAT in Reed &Bull Information Systems v Stedman (1999), IRLR 299. In determining whether theconduct is harassment, it was suggested that it should be viewed from the perspectiveof the victim (Samuels, 2004;......