O'Regan v Iambic Productions
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1989 |
| Year | 1989 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
-
Multi-Code Electronics Industries (M) Bhd and Another v Toh Chun Toh Gordon and Others
...[21] that a mere possibility or unsupported fear of dissipation was therefore insufficient. In O’Regan & Ors v Lambic Productions Ltd (1989) 139 NLJ 1378, which was cited in Choy’s case, Sir Peter Pain expressed the following There are numerous paragraphs in the authorities relating to Mare......
-
Choy Chee Keen Collin v Public Utilities Board
...SLR 362 at p 367). A mere possibility or unsupported fear of dissipation is insufficient: O`Regan & Ors v Iambic Productions Ltd (1989) 139 NLJ 1378, at p 1379 where Sir Peter Pain said: There are numerous paragraphs in the authorities relating to Mareva injunctions which make it plain that......
-
State Bank of India v Dr Vijay Mallya
...that the defendant is likely to move assets or dissipate them; unsupported statements or expressions of fear have little weight ( O'Regan v Iambic Productions (1989) 139 N.L.J. 1378 (Sir Peter Pain).) iv) It is a fundamental principle that a freezing order is not granted for the purpose of ......
-
PJSC Tatneft v Gennadiy Bogolyubov and Others
...unsatisfied". 112 As to the nature of the evidence required, Sir Peter Pain stated as follows in O'Regan v Iambic Productions Ltd [1989] 139 NLJ 1378 (cited with approval by Nugee J in the Holyoake case at [19]): "There are numerous paragraphs in the authorities relating to Mareva injunctio......
Request a trial to view additional results