Reichhold Norway ASA and Another v Goldman Sachs International (A Firm)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Algosaibi Bros v Saad Invs
...v. Unicof Ltd., [2004] 1 Lloyd”s Rep. 196; [2003] EWHC 2676 (Comm), referred to. (3) Reichhold Norway ASA v. Goldman Sachs Intl., [1999] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 40; on appeal, [2000] 1 W.L.R. 173; [2000] 2 All E.R. 679; [1999] 2 Lloyd”s Rep. 567, applied. (4) Seaconsar Far East Ltd. v. Bank Marka......
-
Sony Music Entertainment UK Ltd v Noel Redding Estate Ltd
...of the New York Complaint, I was referred to the decision, at first instance, of Moore-Bick J (as he then was) in Reichhold Norway ASA v Goldman Sachs International [1999] 1 All ER (Comm) 40. The case was concerned with the sale by a Norwegian company (J) of one of its subsidiaries to R, a......
-
Plaza BV v The Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc
...of its case management powers, either by reference to the court's inherent power or under CPR rule 3.1(2)(f). 124 In Reichhold Norway ASA v Goldman Sachs International [1999] 1 All ER (Comm) 40, 47, Moore-Bick J held that case management powers might be used when two sets of proceedings are......
-
Tatiana Akhmedova v Farkhad Teimur Ogly Akhmedov
...advisers for negligent misstatement in relation to the sale. Moore-Bick J stayed the claim pending the outcome of the arbitration: [1999] 1 All ER (Comm) 40. The learned judge said at p.47: “ choosing whom to sue is one thing; choosing in what order to pursue proceedings against different ......
Request a trial to view additional results