Reuben v Brent London Borough Council
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Year | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Barke v SEETEC Business Technology Centre Ltd
...procedure. 23 But, it is submitted, particularly by Mr Green who relies for this purpose on the decision of Morison J in Reuben v Brent London Borough Council [2000] ICR 102, that, once an employment tribunal has given written reasons, it is functus officio and cannot provide (and therefore......
-
Mr P Pan v Portigon AG London Branch
...make such a direction was not free from doubt. 22. That doubt surfaced dramatically in the case of Reuben v Brent London Borough Council [2000] ICR 102. At an interlocutory hearing in that case I put certain questions to the IT Chairman (para 8). At the substantive hearing of the appeal, Mo......
-
Tran v Greenwich Vietnam Community Project
...have been impossible: a year and a half had gone by. It would have had to be remitted to a fresh tribunal to start again. 19 In Reuben v London Borough of Brent [2000] ICR 102, Morison P held that remission was not an option short of allowing the appeal. His reasons (see paragraphs 14 to 18......
-
Lovejit Murgai v Home Office Immigration & Nationality Directorate
...Act 1996, the EAT simply sent the case back to the same tribunal for review. In a subsequent case, Ruben v London Borough of Brent [2000] IRLR 176, at paragraph 17, Morison J described the practice, first established in Yusef v Aberplace Ltd [1994] ICR 850, of returning a case to the tribun......