Revenko v Secretary of State for the Home Department

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date31 July 2000
Date31 July 2000
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • EB (Ethiopia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 d2 Julho d2 2007
    ...of civil rights upon entry, is itself the persecution. The persecution is not merely feared, it has materialised. 42 In Revenko v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2001] QB 601, the applicant was born in that part of the USSR which, in 1991, became the independent state of Moldova. Un......
  • D (AAAA) v Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Min for Justice
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 17 d5 Julho d5 2009
    ...RELATING TO THE STATUS OF REFUGEES & STATELESS PERSONS 1951 (GENEVA CONVENTION) ART 1A(2) REVENKO v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPT 2001 QB 601 2000 3 WLR 1519 M (SH) v REFUGEE APPEALS TRIBUNAL & MIN FOR JUSTICE UNREP CLARK 12.3.2009 2009 IEHC 128 M (S) v MENTAL HEALTH CMSR & ORS UNREP......
  • As (Guinea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 d5 Outubro d5 2018
    ...accept her as a national, and that she had not done. 49 This reasoning was referred to without criticism by Pill LJ in Revenko v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] QB 601 at page 624 G-H and has become known as the Bradshaw principle. We have been referred to a number of dec......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2011-04-11, [2011] UKUT 124 (IAC) (HS (Palestinian - return to Gaza))
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 11 d1 Abril d1 2011
    ...which we have referred above, Scott Baker LJ also considered what had been said in Revenko v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] QB 601, which he considered went no further than to establish that mere statelessness was insufficient in itself to confer refugee status and left o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • The protection of stateless persons in Australian law: the rationale for a statelessness determination procedure.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 40 No. 2, January 2017
    • 1 d0 Janeiro d0 2017
    ...and Citizenship (Cth), PAM3--Assessing Claims of Statelessness (October 2012). (121) Revenko v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] QB 601, (122) Refugee Status, UN Doc PPLA/2014/01, 36. See, eg, Thabet v Minister of Citizenship and Immigration [1998] 4 FC 21 (Canada); Refugee ......
  • Non-refoulement: the search for a consistent interpretation of article 33.
    • United States
    • Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Vol. 42 No. 1, January 2009
    • 1 d4 Janeiro d4 2009
    ...review from 1951 Convention application to nonparties, i.e. refugees such as Mr. Zaoui); Revenko v. Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't, [2001] Q.B. 601, [paragraph] 18 ("[I]t is common ground that Articles 31 and 33 [of the 1951 Convention] sufficiently reflect customary international law.")......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT