Revenue and Customs Commissioners v West

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date29 March 2018
Neutral Citation[2018] UKUT 100 (TCC)
Date29 March 2018
CourtUpper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Michaela Joy Hall (as Liquidator of Ethos Solutions Ltd) v Muhammad Nasim & 62 Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 4 February 2021
    ...Security (contributions) Regulations 2001. The threshold set by these regulations, he submitted, is low. In the case of Stephen West [2018] UKUT 0100 (TCC), for example, the Upper Tribunal held that as long as the employee was aware of the particular steps, then the employee will have recei......
  • Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Tooth
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 14 May 2021
    ...not intended to mislead. She sought support for this submission by reference to West v Revenue and Customs Comrs [2018] UKUT 100 (TCC); [2018] STC 1004 (“ West”). In that case the relevant question was whether the taxpayer knew that there had been a wilful failure by a company by which he w......
  • Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Tooth
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 14 May 2021
    ...believed by the maker to be true, and not intended to mislead. She sought support for this submission by reference to R & C Commrs v West [2018] BTC 509 (“West”). In that case the relevant question was whether the taxpayer knew that there had been a wilful failure by a company by which he w......
  • Christopher Purkiss (as Liquidator of Ethos Solutions Ltd) v Tim Kennedy & 34 Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 8 December 2022
    ...(Contributions) Regulations 2001. The threshold set for recovery under these regulations is low: see by way of example Stephen West [2018] UKUT 0100 (TCC). If PAYE is due and the employer does not pay it, the employee may also be liable to an additional punitive charge under s.222 ITEPA. Wh......
1 books & journal articles
  • Revisiting the Precedential Status of Crown Court Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 85-1, February 2021
    • 1 February 2021
    ...The Kingsbridge Pension Fund Trust v Downs [2017] UKUT 237 (LC); [2017] L & TR 467, [20]; West vRevenue and Customs Commissioners [2018] UKUT 100 (TCC); [2018] STC 1004, [53]; Robertson v Gordon-Webb [2018]UKUT 235 (LC); [2018] L & TR 31, [23]; Governing Body of Lark Hall Primary School v S......