Richard Bold port action de det sur Obligation v Molyneux, le condition de
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
275 cases
-
The Hon. Gaston Browne (The Leader of the Opposition) Appellant v Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda First Respondent [1] Mr. Juno Samuel [2] Mr Nathaniel James [3] Mr Jack Kelsick [4] Mr. Anthonyson King [5] Mrs Glendina McKay [6] Mrs Paula Lee (members of the Antigua and Barbuda Electoral Commission under the provisions of The Representation of the People (Amendment) Act No 12 of 2011) Other Respondents [ECSC]
...to be much force in this argument. 53 Section 6 of the amending Act 2010 amends section 18 of the principal Act by repealing subsections ( 1) and (1A) thereof and enacting words which provide for the period when registration of voters under the new residency qualification criteria will comm......
-
C.O. Williams Construction (ST. Lucia) Ltd Applicant/Defendant v Inter-Island Dredging Company Ltd Respondent/Claimant [ECSC]
...prior to CPR 2000 should be disregarded. Those principles are in fact dressed up in different clothing in my view under CPR 26.8 and CPR 1.1 and 1.2. Under the provisions of CPR 26.8 the draftsman chose to describe them differently, and gave them a stipulated rank and weight, causing them t......
-
[1] Port Zante Merchants Association [2] Sol E Mar [3] Captain Jack [4] Square Duty Free [5] Diamond Island [6] Duty Free Plaza Applicants/Defendants v [1] Alex Decosta [2] Urban Development Corporation [3] Ministry of Tourism [4] Attorney General of St. Christopher and Nevis Respondents/Defendants [ECSC]
...granted permission to the 1st respondent to conduct his barbeque activities. 17 Ms. Martin's affidavit confirmed that sometime between August and 1st October 2013, the St. Kitts Tourism Authority in collaboration with the Urban Development Corporation gave verbal approval for the 1st respon......
-
PSK Construction Ltd (Kavanagh) v Killeen & Higgins
...against Mr. Killeen pursuant to s. 297A of the Companies Act,1963is both for fraudulent and reckless trading pursuant to sub-sections 1(b) and 1(a), respectively. The claim against Ms. Higgins is in respect of the reckless trading pursuant to sub-section 1(a), alone. Section 297A (1) provid......
Get Started for Free