Richards v Dove

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1974
Date1974
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • McGill v Snodgrass
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 25 July 1979
    ...that instead of reviewing the facts disclosed in evidence with meticulous detail as did the learned trial Judge in Richards .v. Dove 1974 1 All E.R. 888 - a case corresponding closely on the facts to the present case - I should give greater attention to the principles applicable to whatever......
  • Bernard v Josephs
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 March 1982
    ...1 Chancery 278 (C.A.). In relation to unmarried couples the main decisions are Cooke v. Head (1972) 1 Weekly Law Reports 518 (C.A.), Richards v. Dove (1974) 1 All England (1973) Reports 888at page 894, Crisp v. Mullins (1975) 233 Estates Gazette 511, reversed on the facts in (1976) 239 Esta......
  • Burns v Burns
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 July 1983
    ...the case of a bungalow built by such a couple and considered what the interests of the woman were as against the man. There was Richards v. Dove (1974) 1 AER 888, a decision of Walton J. against the mistress. Eves v. Eves (1975) 1 WLR 1338 where this court held that there was a constructive......
  • E(R) v D(C)
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 18 February 2016
    ...(Periodical Payments: Children), [1987] 1 W.L.R. 1165; [1987] 2 All E.R. 1084; [1987] 2 FLR 225, referred to. (19) Richards v. Dove, [1974] 1 All E.R. 888, referred to. (20) Rossi v. Rossi, [2007] 1 FLR 790; [2006] 3 F.C.R. 271; [2006] EWHC 1482 (Fam), applied. (21) Suter v. Suter, [1987] F......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Interests in the family home: constructive trusts and estoppel compared
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 3-1, June 1993
    • 1 June 1993
    ...that the claimant's expenditure did not change on purchase of the family home was material in denying the claim in Richards v. Dove [1974] 1 All E.R.888. 12 Falconer v. Falconer [1970] 1 W.L.R.1333; Hargrave v. Newton [1971] 1 W.L.R.1611. 13 Hazell v. Hazell [1972] 1 W.L.R.301; Hall v. Hall......