Richards v Dove
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1974 |
| Date | 1974 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
McGill v Snodgrass
...that instead of reviewing the facts disclosed in evidence with meticulous detail as did the learned trial Judge in Richards .v. Dove 1974 1 All E.R. 888 - a case corresponding closely on the facts to the present case - I should give greater attention to the principles applicable to whatever......
-
Burns v Burns
...the case of a bungalow built by such a couple and considered what the interests of the woman were as against the man. There was Richards v. Dove (1974) 1 AER 888, a decision of Walton J. against the mistress. Eves v. Eves (1975) 1 WLR 1338 where this court held that there was a constructiv......
-
Bernard v Josephs
...1 Chancery 278 (C.A.). In relation to unmarried couples the main decisions are Cooke v. Head (1972) 1 Weekly Law Reports 518 (C.A.), Richards v. Dove (1974) 1 All England (1973) Reports 888at page 894, Crisp v. Mullins (1975) 233 Estates Gazette 511, reversed on the facts in (1976) 239 Esta......
-
Eves v Eves
...and to man and mistress, and may be to other relationships too." This principle was considered by Mr. Justice Walton in the case of Richards v. Dove 1974 I All, E.R. 888. But that case turned on its own special circumstances and as not of any general 13The principle does apply in the presen......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Interests in the family home: constructive trusts and estoppel compared
...that the claimant's expenditure did not change on purchase of the family home was material in denying the claim in Richards v. Dove [1974] 1 All E.R.888. 12 Falconer v. Falconer [1970] 1 W.L.R.1333; Hargrave v. Newton [1971] 1 W.L.R.1611. 13 Hazell v. Hazell [1972] 1 W.L.R.301; Hall v. Hall......