Richardson v Richardson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1895
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Hiap Huat Pottery; Starlite Ceramic Industry Ltd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 1973
  • Starlite Ceramic Industry Ltd v Hiap Huat Pottery
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 21 Febrero 1973
    ...prosecution or defence of his client`s case.This somewhat modifies the dicta of the Court of Appeal in the case of Richardson v Richardson [1895] P 346 to the effect that: the object of giving costs was to indemnify the successful party against the expense to which he had been put by the un......
  • Garibdass et Al v Singh et Al
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 7 Mayo 1996
    ...“The object of giving costs is to indemnify the successful party against the expense to which he has been put. ( Richardson v. Richardson [1895] P. 346)”. 65 With respect to the issue of a proper fee to junior counsel the same rationale applies here as on the chamber application. 66 The Tax......
  • Starlite Ceramic Industry Ltd v Hiap Huat Pottery
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 21 Febrero 1973
    ...prosecution or defence of his client`s case.This somewhat modifies the dicta of the Court of Appeal in the case of Richardson v Richardson [1895] P 346 to the effect that: the object of giving costs was to indemnify the successful party against the expense to which he had been put by the un......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT