Richardson v Richardson (No 2)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1994
Year1994
Date1994
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Richardson v Richardson (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 December 1994
    ...1988 order. I can find no error in principle at fixing the quantum at £12,000 per annum. I would dismiss this appeal. LORD JUSTICE MANN[1994] 2 FLR 1051. The case has a long and unhappy history. The husband was born in 1935 and is now 59 years old. He is a successful surgeon. The wife was b......
  • Jones v Jones
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 June 2000
    ...my subsequent decision at a later hearing on the merits was appealed and came to this court in December. The judgments are reported at [1996] 2FLR 617. Of course this court was concerned directly only with the merits, but it is to be noted, in passing, that Balcombe LJ in the course of his ......
  • PHILIPPA Carol Richardson v (1) Christopher MORTON (2) EATON Evans & Morris
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 February 2002
  • SB v PB (Financial Provision)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...to the wife to hold her to the terms of the order: see Edgar v Edgar [1980] 1 WLR 1410; Camm v Camm (1983) 4 FLR 571; and Richardson v Richardson[1994] 1 FCR 826. The wife was at the material time psychologically and emotionally disturbed and required very great care and sensitivity from he......
  • Get Started for Free