Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Neutral Citation | UKEAT/458/08 |
| Year | 2009 |
| Date | 2009 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
584 cases
-
Ms Janette Parsons v Birmingham City Council and Birmingham Children’s Trust: 1304537/2017 and others
...submissions on behalf of the Respondent, Ms Hodgetts reminded the Tribunal of Underhill P’s Judgment in Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal [2009] ICR724, “A Respondent should not be held liable merely because his conduct has had the effect of producing a prescribed consequence: it should be r......
-
Miss K Wilson v Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust: 2405366/2018
...that has the proscribed purpose or effect, and • which relates to a relevant protected characteristic In Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal [2009] ICR 724 EAT Mr Justice Underhill expressed the view that it would be a healthy discipline for a Tribunal in any claim alleging unlawful harassment......
-
Mr M Gago and Miss K Gorska (now known as Mrs K Gago) v Uneek Clothing Company Ltd: 1600212/2016
...of hypersensitivity or the imposition of legal liability in respect of every unfortunate phrase: Richmond Pharmacology Ltd v. Dhaliwal [2009] IRLR 336. 69. Section 27 of EqA defines victimisation, relevantly for our purposes, as (1) A person (A) victimises another person (B) if A subjects B......
-
M Hanif v Department for Work and Pensions: 2500446/2019 and 2504225/2019
...or an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment was created for them: Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal [2009] ICR 724, EAT. A claim of harassment will not be made out if it is not reasonable for the conduct to have the effect of violating the employee’s dignity ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Sexual Harassment In The Workplace: What Scottish Companies Need To Know
...The concept of the ‘hypersensitive’ claimant was considered by the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal [2009] IRLR 336. The EAT emphasised that it was important not to encourage the imposition of legal liability in every unfortunate phrase and that violating is a ......
1 books & journal articles
-
Muslim women in the workplace and the Equality Act 2010: Opportunities for an intersectional analysis
...and/orrejected’.87. Richmond Pharmacology Limited v Dhaliwal (EAT) 2009 ICR 724.88. Richmond Pharmacology Limited v Dhaliwal (EAT) 2009 ICR 724, paras 20–1.89. See Rights of Women (2014).90. EA, s124. The tribunal can also make a declaration as to the rights of the claimant and re-spondent ......