Richmond v Branson & Son
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1914 |
| Date | 1914 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
-
Cheong Kim Seah v Lim Poh Choo
...SLR (R) 797; [1965-1968] SLR 694 (folld) Parsons v Parsons [1975] 1 WLR 1272; [1975] 3 All ER 344 (distd) Richmond v Branson & Son [1914] 1 Ch 968 (folld) Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v Comptoir d'Escompte de Mulhouse [1925] AC 112 (folld) Wong Phui Lun Joseph v Yeoh Loon Goit [19......
-
Zoya Ltd v Sheikh Nasir Ahmed (trading as Property Mart) (No 2)
...their authority, and that this is a straightforward case in which I should apply the basic principle explained by Warrington J. in Richmond v Branson & Son [1914] 1 Ch 968, 974 as follows: "If a solicitor is acting without authority in an action brought by a plaintiff who is not alleged to......
-
Paul Sutton and Ge Captial Commercial Finance Limitedanglo Petroleum Ltd and Ge Capital Commecial Finance Ltd
...to apply to strike out the proceedings, joining the solicitor to that application – see the observations of Mr Justice Warrington in Richmond v Branson & Son [1914] 1 Ch 968, 972, 974, approved in Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v Comptoir d'Escompte de Mulhouse and others [1925] AC ......
-
Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others (Original Appeal) and Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others v Courts and Others (Cross Appeal)
...Russia Commercial and Industrial Bank v. Comptoir D'Escompte de Mulhouse [1925] A.C. 112 approved the decision of Warrington J. in Richmond v. Branson & Sons [1914] 1 Ch. 968 where at page 974 he said: "But the real question is the authority of the solicitor. Is that a question which can b......
Request a trial to view additional results