Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Ricket v The Metropolitan Railway Company

The Law Reports Cited in 10 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1867
Date1867
CourtHouse of Lords (England)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Wildtree Hotels Ltd and Others v Harrow London Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 June 1998
    ...for the occasional firm foothold and cautiously proceed from there." 23 Lord Wilberforce referred to Ricket v Metropolitan Railway Co (1867) LR 2 HL 175, Metropolitan Board of Works v McCarthy (1874) LR 7 HL 243 and Caledonian Railway Co v Walker's Trustees (1882) 7 App Cas 259, Lord Wilber......
  • Moto Hospitality Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 July 2007
    ... ... in a series of cases in the 19 th century, culminating in Metropolitan Board of Works v McCarthy (1874) LR 7 HL 243, and Caledonian Ry Co v ... to many of the 19 th C cases lay in the rapid development of the railway system, which inevitably had an adverse effect on many businesses ed with the road network. In Ricket v Metropolitan Railway Co (1867) LR 2 HL 175, 198–9, Lord Cranworth ... compensation is payable under section 10 of the Act of 1965 if the company or statutory authority acted outside its powers. iv) ... ...
  • Colour Quest Ltd v Total Downstream UK Plc [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 20 March 2009
    ...cases on injurious affection caused by the construction of the works returned to more logical principles. Ricket v Metropolitan Railway Co LR 2. HL 175 was explained and distinguished in later cases in your Lordships' House until it became very difficult to say for what proposition, if any,......
  • Wildtree Hotels Ltd and Others v Harrow London Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 22 June 2000
    ...particularly relied upon passages in the judgments of Lord Chelmsford and Lord Cranworth in Ricket v. Metropolitan Railway Co. (1867) L.R.2 H.L. 175. This case, in which the House of Lords by a majority of two to one (Lord Westbury dissenting) deprived the landlord of the "Pickled Egg" in C......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT