RM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Neutral Citation[2010] UKUT 238 (AAC)
Date2010
Year2010
CourtUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • JS v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (IS)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 16 Abril 2019
    ...[69] of Mirga.” 23. And as Judge Rowland had observed at paragraph 9 in his earlier decision in Mirga itself (RM v SSWP (IS) [2010] UKUT 238 (AAC)), “[t]he question whether there has been an accidental omission from European Community legislation can only be answered by looking at the broad......
  • MM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (ESA)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 10 Octubre 2017
    ...policy”. 27. Reference to Mirga in its earlier stages suggests a rationale for the approach of the EU legislator. In RM v SSWP (IS) [2010] UKUT 238(AAC) Judge Rowland noted “There is no general provision in either Article 18 or, more importantly, the Directive, requiring hard cases to be ex......
  • Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v HY and LW (RP)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 20 Julio 2017
    ...because decisions as to status are generally only prospective (see R(IS) 6/08 and RM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (IS) [2010] UKUT 238 (AAC), the latter decision having been subject to appeals to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court without anything being said on this but......
  • RP CE 855 2014
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 6 Septiembre 2016
    ...until 11 November 2005 (i.e. for less than 12 months). According to the Upper Tribunal’s decision in the same case (RM v SSWP (IS) [2010] UKUT 238 (AAC)), subsequently appealed but without successful challenge to the findings of fact, she had a further (unregistered) job for about two month......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT