Robb Appellant Against Salamis (M & I) Ltd (Formerly Known as Salamis Marine & Industrialltd) Respondents

JurisdictionScotland
Year2005
Date2005
CourtCourt of Session (Inner House - Extra Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Hide v The Steeplechase Company (Cheltenham) Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 May 2013
    ...the sheriff's findings in fact, the Extra Division explored exactly how the accident to the pursuer might have happened. They then held, 2005 SLT 523, 540, para 115, that the sheriff had to consider whether it was reasonably foreseeable that an employee would be injured in the way they desc......
  • Inquiry Under The Fatal Accidents And Inquiries Act 1976 Into The Sudden Death Of Thomas Bolesworth
    • United Kingdom
    • Fatal Accident Determinations (Scotland - United Kingdom)
    • 23 January 2008
    ...with James McNamara trading as R. McMillan, Butchers: United Wholesale Grocers Ltd v Sher 1993 SLT 284; Robb v Salamis (M&I) Limited 2005 SLT 523. Accordingly, although Mr Bolesworth was only lending a hand on a temporary basis for a few days, all the statutory duties incumbent on his emplo......
  • Robb Appellant Against Salamis (M & I) Ltd (Formerly Known as Salamis Marine & Industrialltd) Respondents
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 13 December 2006
    ...finding of contributory negligence by finding that the pursuer was 50% to blame for the accident but otherwise refused the appeal: 2005 SLT 523. The appellant now appeals to your Lordships' House under section 32(5) of the Court of Session Act 1988, which states that the judgment of the Cou......
  • Matthew Coia Against Portavadie Estates Limited
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 6 January 2015
    ...would not have been instructed to clear the lodge. This, he accepted, distinguished the present case from Robb v Salamis (M & I) Limited 2005 SLT 523, 2007 SC (HL) 71. However, although counsel did not suggest that the circumstances of the present case were equivalent to those on an offshor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT