Robb v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1991
Date1991
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Philpott v Ogilvy and Mather Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 21 March 2000
    ...LTD 1994 ELR 251 PHELAN V BIC 1997 ELR 208 BOLAND V PHEONIX SHANNON 1997 ELR 113 ROB V HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM LONDONBOROUGH COUNCIL 1991 ICR 514 JONES V GWENT CO COUNCIL 1992 IRLR 251 HARTE V KELLY 1997 ELR 125 LONERGAN V SALTER-TOWNSEND & IRISH COUNCIL FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES & MIN FOR......
  • Paraic Bergin v Galway Clinic Doughiska Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 2 November 2007
    ...ELR 249, Evans v IRFBServices (Ireland) Ltd [2005] IEHC 107, [2005] 2 ILRM 358 and Robb v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [1991] IRLR 72 considered - Order restraining replacement of plaintiff subject to terms granted (2007/5154P - Clarke J - 2/11/2007 [2007] IEHC 386 Bergin v Gal......
  • Jan Gryf-Lowczowski v Hinchington Healthcare NHS Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 2 November 2005
    ...Jones v. Lee and Guilding [1980] ICR 310; Irani v. Southampton and Southwest Hampshire Health Authority [1985] ICR 590; Robb v. London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [1991] IRLR 72 and Powell v. London Borough of Brent [1987] ICR 176. 67 Mr Hendy submits that the object of the injunctive......
  • Geys v Societe Generale, London Branch
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 19 December 2012
    ...hearing. In the Irani case, cited above, Warner J made an analogous injunction. In Robb v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council [1991] ICR 514 the claimant, who was Hammersmith's director of finance, had been responsible for speculative, indeed unlawful, investments of its funds. Ha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • The Common Law Obligations of the Employer Under the Contract of Employment
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Individual Employment Law. Second Edition
    • 16 June 2008
    ...have relaxed the no specif‌ic performance rule in such circumstances. Example: Robb v. Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council , [1991] I.C.R. 514 (Q.B.). See generally Chapter 9, Section F(2). INDI VIDUAL EMPLOYMENT LAW 94 B. the ImplIeD DUty to pay For Work DoNe, Gr atUItIeS, aND em......
  • The Common Law Obligations of the Employer under the Contract of Employment
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Individual Employment Law
    • 1 September 2000
    ...have relaxed the no specific performance rule in such circumstances. E.g., Robb v. Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council, [1991] I.C.R. 514 (Q.B.). See generally section F(2) of chapter 9 of this book. 22 See section B(6) of chapter 6 of this book. The Common Law Obligations of the ......
  • Employment injunctions: an over-loose discretion
    • Ireland
    • Irish Judicial Studies Journal No. 2-9, July 2009
    • 1 July 2009
    ...v. National Associations of Citizens Advice Bureaux Ltd. [1990] I.L.R.L. 393 and Robb v. Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council [1991] I.R.L.R. 72. 10Brennan and Osman (eds.) Butterworths Employment Law Guide (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2005). 2009] Employment Injunctions 7 increasing ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT