Robb v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1991 |
| Date | 1991 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 cases
-
Philpott v Ogilvy and Mather Ltd
...LTD 1994 ELR 251 PHELAN V BIC 1997 ELR 208 BOLAND V PHEONIX SHANNON 1997 ELR 113 ROB V HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM LONDONBOROUGH COUNCIL 1991 ICR 514 JONES V GWENT CO COUNCIL 1992 IRLR 251 HARTE V KELLY 1997 ELR 125 LONERGAN V SALTER-TOWNSEND & IRISH COUNCIL FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES & MIN FOR......
-
Paraic Bergin v Galway Clinic Doughiska Ltd
...ELR 249, Evans v IRFBServices (Ireland) Ltd [2005] IEHC 107, [2005] 2 ILRM 358 and Robb v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [1991] IRLR 72 considered - Order restraining replacement of plaintiff subject to terms granted (2007/5154P - Clarke J - 2/11/2007 [2007] IEHC 386 Bergin v Gal......
-
Geys v Societe Generale, London Branch
...him prior to any such hearing. In the Irani case, cited above, Warner J made an analogous injunction. In Robb v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council [1991] ICR 514 the claimant, who was Hammersmith's director of finance, had been responsible for speculative, indeed unlawful, invest......
-
Jan Gryf-Lowczowski v Hinchington Healthcare NHS Trust
...to deprive Mr Gryf-Lowczowski of the disciplinary procedures to which he is (as I have held) contractually entitled. As Morland J said in Robb at 523: "I now conclude as to why in my judgment, the Plaintiff has established that he is entitled to the injunctive relief sought… (3) Without the......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
The Common Law Obligations of the Employer Under the Contract of Employment
...have relaxed the no specific performance rule in such circumstances. Example: Robb v. Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council , [1991] I.C.R. 514 (Q.B.). See generally Chapter 9, Section F(2). INDI VIDUAL EMPLOYMENT LAW 94 B. the ImplIeD DUty to pay For Work DoNe, Gr atUItIeS, aND em......
-
The Common Law Obligations of the Employer under the Contract of Employment
...have relaxed the no specific performance rule in such circumstances. E.g., Robb v. Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council, [1991] I.C.R. 514 (Q.B.). See generally section F(2) of chapter 9 of this book. 22 See section B(6) of chapter 6 of this book. The Common Law Obligations of the ......
-
Employment injunctions: an over-loose discretion
...v. National Associations of Citizens Advice Bureaux Ltd. [1990] I.L.R.L. 393 and Robb v. Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council [1991] I.R.L.R. 72. 10Brennan and Osman (eds.) Butterworths Employment Law Guide (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2005). 2009] Employment Injunctions 7 increasing ......