Robinson & Company v The King

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1921
Date1921
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • The Lord Advocate V. Andrew Mcnamara
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 4 June 2009
    ...and meaning of the clause upon which reliance is placed." [16] A similar approach was adopted in John Robinson & Co Ltd v The King [1921] 3 KB 183, where the Court of Appeal had to consider whether an appeal was a "legal proceeding ... instituted", within the meaning of the Indemnity Act 19......
  • Duralla Pty Ltd v Plant
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Motor Image Enterprises Pte Ltd v SCDA Architects Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 3 November 2011
    ...Motor Image's appeal: at [40]. Antaios Compania Naviera SA v Salen Rederierna AB [1985] AC 191 (refd) John Robinson and Co Ltd v R [1921] 3 KB 183 (refd) Moore, Nettlefold & Co v The Singer Manufacturing Co [1904] 1 KB 820 (refd) Ng Huat Foundations Pte Ltd v Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd [2006]......
  • Pretoria City Council v Meerlust Investments (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Appellate Division
    • 16 November 1961
    ...379, an appeal is not a 'proceeding instituted' as the expression is understood by lawyers (cf. John Rolinson and Co. Ltd v The King, B 1921 (3) K.B. 183 at pp. 192 - 3). The inclusion in the power of the familiar words 'and to proceed to the final end and determination therof' was, in my v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT