Robinson-Scott v Robinson-Scott

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1957
Date1957
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Perrini v Perrini
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Indyka v. Indyka [1969] 1 A.C. 33, H.L.(E.): Robinson-Scott v. Robinson-Scott [1958] P. 71 and Law v. Gustin (formerly Law) [1976] Fam. 155 applied ... Padolecchia v. Padolecchia (orse. Leis) [1968] P. 314 ... ...
  • Indyka v Indyka
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 23 May 1967
    ...wife for three years or more, e.g., on the ground of the nationality of the spouses. This problem was solved by Karminski J. in Robinson Scott v. Robinson Scott [1958] P.71. He said (at page 87): "I believe that the true question to be answered in this case is whether the Courts of this Co......
  • Indyka v Indyka
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 13 July 1966
    ...a divorce, that divorce will be recognised in this country, even though her husband was not domiciled in that country, see Robinson-Scott v. Robinson-Scott, 1958 Probate, p. 15Mr Justice Latey accepted these new propositions to this extent; if the first wife had obtained a divorce in Czech......
  • Janes v. Pardo, (2002) 208 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 350 (NFTD)
    • Canada
    • 14 December 2001
    ...81, refd to. [para. 10]. LeMesurier v. LeMesurier, [1985] A.C. 517 (P.C.), refd to. [para. 15]. Robinson-Scott v. Robinson-Scott, [1957] 3 All E.R. 473, refd to. [para. Indyka v. Indyka, [1969] 1 A.C. 33 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 18]. Edward v. Edward Estate and Skolrood (1987), 57 Sask.R. 67......
5 books & journal articles
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...ONSC 321. As to the significance of the term “habitually resident,” see Section B(11), above in this chapter. Zhang v Lin, 2010 ABQB 420. [1958] P 71; see text below and see Julien D Payne, “Recognition of Foreign Divorce Decrees in Canadian Courts” (1961) 10 ICLQ 846. Compare Droit de la f......
  • Divorce: Jurisdiction; Judgments; Foreign Divorces; Grounds for Divorce; Bars
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 August 2020
    ...ONSC 321. As to the significance of the term “habitually resident,” see Section B(11), above in this chapter. Zhang v Lin, 2010 ABQB 420. [1958] P 71; see text below and see Julien D Payne, “Recognition of Foreign Divorce Decrees in Canadian Courts” (1961) 10 ICLQ 846. Compare Droit de la f......
  • Running Government Like a Business
    • United States
    • American Review of Public Administration, The No. 29-1, March 1999
    • 1 March 1999
    ...is: how arefreedom and democracy in the long run at all possible under the domination ofhighly developed capitalism? (in Gerth & Mills, 1958, p. 71)In 1931, John Dewey expressed concern for the future of democraticgovernance:The dominant issue is whether the people of the United States are ......
  • A Place Like Home
    • United States
    • American Review of Public Administration, The No. 35-1, March 2005
    • 1 March 2005
    ...the darkness of what needs to be hidden against the light of publicity is private property, aprivately owned place to hide in. (Arendt, 1958, p. 71)ButArendt’s public-private distinction makes sense,it seems to me, only if the two realms are seen as consti-tuted through practices and theref......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT