Robinson v Bailey
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1948 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Zoe Claire Bucknell v Alchemy Estates (Holywell) Ltd
...such uses as were reasonably required at the date of the grant: see eg White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne, Limited [1913] 1 Ch 113, 116; Robinson v Bailey [1948] 2 All ER 791; British Railways Board v Glass [1965] Ch 538, 558F; Jelbert v Davis [1968] 1 WLR 589; Holmes v Hughes, unreported,......
-
St. Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocesan Board of Finance v Clark (No. 2)
...nowhere in the present case. We do not think a few words quoted from the judgment of Lord Greene, Master of the Rolls, in the case of Robinson v. Bailey (1948 2 All England Reports, 791, at page 795), when read in their context, lend support to this contention. 20 Second, is the maxim " Omn......
-
Sebastian Rupert Vance v Carol-Ann Collerton
...too weak to stand use of the road by omnibuses. Their use was outside the contemplation of the parties at the time of the grant. 74 In Robinson v. Bailey [1948] 2 All ER 791, White v. Grand Hotel Eastbourne was applied and Todrick's case distinguished. The Court of Appeal upheld Harman J's......
-
Jelbert v Davis
...a hotel. That meant a different user. But it was held to be within the grant. That case was applied in Robinson v. Bailey, 1948, 2 All England Reports, p. 791. In that case a plot of land, which was expected to be used as a dwelling house, was turned into a place for storing building mater......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Construction Of A Right Of Way
...was used at the date of the grant (see White v Grand Hotel, Eastbourne Ltd (1912) 106 L.T. 785; [1913] 1 Ch. 113; Robinson v Bailey [1948] 2All E.R. 791). In White v Grand Hotel the dominant land had effectively been converted from a private dwelling-house into an hotel, and the court had t......