Robinson v Tobin
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1816 |
| Date | 01 January 1816 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 171 E.R. 490
IN THE KING'S BENCH.
490 ROBINSON V. TOBIN 1 8TA1K. 337. in the king's bench. Guildhall. robinson v. tobin. {A policy is effected on the plaintiff's share of goods, valued at £500, but upon its turning out that the plaintiff's interest waa larger, the words are added m the margin of the policy on the plaintiff's share of goods, say one-fifth, valued at £1000, to which the defendant's initials were subscribed, the declaration need not notice the original stipulation.) This was an action of assumpsit oa a policy of insurance on goods by the ship "Hazard," at and from Liverpool to Amelia island, loss alleged by capture. The declaration alleged the policy to have been effected on the plaintiff's share of goods, say one-fifth, valued at £1006. On production of the policy it appeared, that the insurance had originally been effected " on the [337] profits of goods valued at £500," to which the defendant's name was subscribed. In the margin of the policy were the words " on his share of the goods, say one-fifth, valued at £1000," and under them the defendant had subscribed the initials of his name. It appeared that after the policy had beeii signed by .the defendant, it had turned out that his interest was larger than had before...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
The Same v Bateman
...v. Jackson. 1 M. & S. 217, Robinson v. Touray. 4 Camp. 107, Ridndale v. Sheddm. 5 Taunt. 359, Sawtell v. London. 1 Marsh, 99, S. C. 1 Stark. 336, Robinson v. Tobin. 5 M. & S. 267, Ramstrom v. Bell. 2 B. & A. 320, Weir v. Aberdeen. [1 B. & Ad. 81, Brockelbank v. Su-gnte.] But, independently ......