Rogers v Ingham
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 1875 |
Date | 1875 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
- Choong Gim Guan v Choong Gim Seong; Re Estate of Choong Lye Hin, deceased
- AM Drysdale (Deceased), Re; Municipal Commissioners of the Town of Singapore v The Official Assignee
-
Woolwich Equitable Building Society v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...is that money paid under a mistake of law, by itself and without more, cannot be recovered back. James L.J. pointed that out in Rogers v. Ingham. If there is something more in addition to a mistake of law—if there is something in the defendant's conduct which shows that, of the two of them,......
-
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation and Others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation and Others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
...strictly accurate. Before 1939 the mistake of law bar applied to common law actions as well as to claims in equity: see Rogers v Ingham (1876) 3 Ch D 351, 355–356, per James LJ, supported by both Mellish LJ at p 357 and Baggallay JA at p 358. Lord Goff in Kleinwort Benson, at p 389, incorre......
Request a trial to view additional results