Le Roign port quare impedit v l'Evesque de Lincolne et John Cock pur le
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 354
DEL COMMON-BANK
CXXXVI. Le Roign port quare impedit vers I'Eveaque de Lincolne et John Cock pur le Kectory de Haversham, et declare q, fuit enact per Parlement le 13 ann de son reign que nul person serra admit a un Benefice one cure sil nad devant ceo subscribe a les Articles de religion en le presence del ordinary, &c. et c^ touts admiss institutions et inductions de ascun person contre le forme del dit statute serra void cycome ils ne usseot estre, et declare ^ I'Eaglise devient void per mort de un Prestman per q^ Thomas Lucy Chevalier, &c. present a mesme 1'Esglise un Thomas Ashton q, a son presentation fuit admit institute et induct, et allege q^ le dit Ashton devant son admission et institution ne subscribe a les dits Articles accordant al statute avantdit, per reason de q^ le dit Esglise continue void per 2 ans & pluis, nul incumbent per le Metropolitan ou auter a ceo present, per q^ droit a presenter covenable person al dit Esglise accrue al Roign per reason de son prerogative, & les Defendants luy disturbe. Sur quel fuib demurr, & pur ceo q, ne fuit allege en le declaration q^ fuit Esglise oue cure accordant a les parols de le statute de 13 Eliz. fuit tenus per le Court q^ le declaration ne fuit bone, sur q^ auter breve de quare impedit fuit port, & le declaration en ceo point fuib amend, & aur le declaration fuit demurr, Et allege q^ ne fuit sufficient, pur ceo q, en cest Case le ordinary doit doner notice de le default del Clerke en non-subscribing de les Articles quel nest allege, ne en fait fuit pur q^ le ordinary mesme 1& Metropolitan ne le Roign ne prender advantage de laps, & compare ceo a divers Cases de notice en nostre livers en queux le ordinary doner notice al Patron come deprivation, resignation, nient lerned, & semblables, per reason de queux I'EsgHses remain void ou deveign void, en queux Cases le Esglise esteants voids per 1 ANDERSON, 63. 355 reason de chose remaining pluia tost en le conusance de le ordinary que en le Patron, notice [63} doit estre done devant que le ordinary per laps gainer ascun intereat, a que fuit dit que nient...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
NAP Holdings UK Ltd v Whittles (HM Inspector of Taxes)
...to it of the 100 Astbro shares is $400 million, being the market value of the shares at the time of acquisition, by virtue of sections 29A and 62 of the CGTA 1979, dealing with transactions between connected persons, which Overseas and Napuk were as being members of the same group of compan......
-
Digicel (Jamaica) Ltd v Office of Utilties Regulation
...to order that the decision of the OUR shall not have effect until the appeal is determined. In other words, under these subsections 60(8)(a) and 62(3) the OUR and the Tribunal respectively have power to stay a decision of the OUR pending the determination of the reconsideration or appeal. T......
-
David Carol Bristol Appellant v Dr. Richardson St. Rose Respondent [ECSC]
...the finding on justification upon which Dr. St. Rose could rely in these appeal proceedings. He cited as authority rules 62.4(1)(c) and 62.4(8) of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court Civil Procedure Rules 2000.2 5 Compendiously, rules 62.4(1)(c) and 62.4(8) state that a notice of appeal mus......
-
Auckland Council v Greenmccahill Holdings Ltd
...work: 23 As the matter was argued by Mr Lange for the Council, the two specific questions of interpretation posed are whether ss 62(1)(b)(ii) and 62(1)(e) prohibit, first, the making of a valuation presumption that the relevant public work exists for the purposes of an “after” valuation pur......