Le Roign port quare impedit v l'Evesque de Gloc. & Savaker en quel Action le
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 429
DEL COMMON-BANK
[200] CCXXXVI. Le Roign port quare impedit vers 1'Evesque de Gloe. & Savaker en quel Action le Case fuit que Sir James Crofts esteant Controller del meson le Roign, & de son Counsel, avoit 2. Chaplens accordant a le statute de Anno 21. H. 8. cap. 13. queux fuerunt preferres a deux Benefices solonq^ le purport del dit statute, & puis il avoit le dit Savaker d'eatre son Chaplen que (eyant un Benefice oue cure) avoit procure le second, & c desouth le colour que il fuit le Chaplen le dit Sir James Crofts oue tiels qualifications come auters avoint, & sur cest matter fuit demurre, & le dout surdant en nest Case fuit per reason de les parols en raesme le statute conteins, queux soit in effect come ensua, scilicet que le Controller poit aver 2. Chaplens que poit purchase license a prender & aver 2. Benefices oue cure &o purvieu que nul person a que ascun number des Chaplens eat limit &c. avancera ascun spiritual home ouster le number a eux appoint per le dit statute, & tout le Court teign que apres que 2. fuerunt advances p c means que est limit per lo statute per le Controller, que il ne puit aver auter advance apres; car le power per le dit statute est execute & per consequence determine ; car poit aver deux queux poiet estre advances queux il avoit, mes nemy plusors: pur que Jugement fuit done accordant, & fuit teign per troys de lea Juges que si le Controller ad deux Chaplens queux poient prender deux Benefices accordant al statute, & il (eyant deux) prist tierce quo cest tierce Chaplen ne poit prender deux Benefices; car ouster le number de deux il ne poit aver a un temps queux prender advantage de cast statute, & c per le intention del dit proviso ou purvieu que dit que il ne avancer ouster le number de deux ; car cest parol avancer (come en c place est miae) serra prise pur le inabilment de les deux da prender deux: Benefices &c. & nemy de ascun Presentments al Avowsons, queux ascun voile intend le advancement mencyon en le proviso; car c est hors del intention del dit statute come le experience touts foils apres le fesance de c tanque a ore ad estre ; car ad estre allow...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Walls v P.J. Walls Holdings Ltd
...The Memorandum of Association provides that the share capital of the company is €1,375,250 million divided into 1,100,000 ordinary shares and 200 12% non-cumulative preference shares of €1.25 each. The Articles of Association provide that the preference shares shall be preferential as to di......
-
Moodie v W. & J. Shepherd (Bookbinders) Ltd
...were registered in the name of the deceased, William Shepherd. 300 of the remaining 800 shares were registered in the name of John Shepherd, and 200 in the name of William Shepherd, but the petition states that they were held by each of them as trustees for their father William. The Petitio......
-
River Doree Holdings Ltd Claimant v Attorney General of St. Lucia Defendant [ECSC]
...area actually available for agricultural purposes turned out to be 465 acres of which 265 acres were suitable for intensive cultivation and 200 acres of anticipated arable land was simply not there which the previous Government was informed of in 1989. Further, some 183 acres more farm and ......
-
Te Runanga o Ngai Te Rangi Iwi Trust and Others v Bay of Plenty Regional Council
...16.0 metres and widen by 115 metres 7.0 Maunganui Roads Deepen to 16.0 metres and widen by 50 metres Create turning basin 16.0 metres • deep and 200 metres by 200 meters 0.4 Stella Passage Deepen to 16,0 metres 1.3 5.2 The total quantity of material removed for maintenance dredging purposes......