Rolfe v Rolfe
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] EWHC 244 (Ch) |
| Date | 2010 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Ciban Management Corporation v Citco (BVI) Ltd and another
...the point, he stated that he was willing to assume (in the same way as he had done as Newey J in In re Tulsesense Ltd; Rolfe v Rolfe [2010] EWHC 244 (Ch); [2010] 2 BCLC 525, para 42) that “the assent of the beneficial owners of a share can meet Duomatic requirements.” Certainly the appellan......
-
Peter Raymond Henrikson v Charles Riley Constant
...open to any other party to ratify the appointments and removals. 114 I was referred to the decision of Newey J in Re Tulsesense Ltd [2010] EWHC 244 (Ch) where one person, R, held two shares, one on his own behalf and one as executor of his late brother W's estate. The court held, in circum......
-
Henry George Dickinson v Nal Realisations (Staffordshire) Ltd
...Turning to the contention based on the Dickinsons' membership of the Pension Scheme, I noted in Re Tulsesense Ltd [201] EWHC 244 (Ch), [2010] 2 BCLC 525 that the question whether the approval of a share's beneficial owners can satisfy Duomatic requirements had been touched on in several aut......
-
Gould
...that she did not assent to the identity of her replacement or that she did not know that her assent was required. [86] In Re Tulsesense [2010] EWHC 244, the Duomatic argument was rejected on the basis that the articles were ignored rather than there being any intention to modify: 66 … . The......
Request a trial to view additional results