Rome and another v Punjab National Bank (No 2)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1990
Year1990
Date1990
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • China Agrotech Holdings Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 19 Septiembre 2017
    ...(20) Rome v. Punjab National Bank (No. 2), [1989] 1 W.L.R. 1211; [1990] 1 All E.R. 58; [1989] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 354; (1989), 5 BCC 785; [1990] BCLC 20, considered. (21) Rubin v. Eurofinance SA, [2012] UKSC 46; [2013] 1 A.C. 236; [2012] 3 W.L.R. 1019; [2013] 1 All E.R. 521; [2013] 1 All E.R. (C......
  • Tao Commodity Trader Inc v Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V.
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 19 Febrero 2004
    ...with sections 376(b), (c) and 377(1). The plaintiffs also relied on the English decisions of Rome and another v Punjab Bank (No. 2) [1990] BCLC 20, Sabatier v The Trading Company (1927) 1 Ch 495 and Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited v Sedgwick, Collins and Company, Limited......
1 books & journal articles
  • OBTAINING JURISDICTION OVER FOREIGN COMPANIES
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1995, December 1995
    • 1 Diciembre 1995
    ...2 Lloyd’s Rep 215. More serious irregularities or that which prejudice the defendant, of course, may deserve less sympathy. 84 [1990] BCLC 20. 85 Rome v Punjab National Bank (No.2) [1989] 1 WLR 1211. 86 Punjab National Bank’s case, ibid, see the judgment of Parker LJ at p,1221. 87 Supra, no......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT