Rome v Punjab National Bank
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 1988 |
Date | 1988 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Harris and Others v Society of Lloyd's
...be exercised sparingly and then only for such documents as can be shown to be necessary for the just disposal of the application: Rome v Punjab National Bank [1989] 2 All E.R. 136. There are good reasons for concluding that the same if not a stricter approach is appropriate under the provi......
-
Eastbrook BV and Eastbrook AG v Cooper, Lines, Butterfield and Madeiros 1994 Civil Appeal No. 11
... ... 142(3)(iv). (4) The judge erred in relying on Rome v. Puniab and Sabatier v. Trading Company, while failing to take account ... ...
-
The Canada Trust Company (Plaintiffs) and Others v Wolfgang Otto Stolzenberg and Others (Defendants
... ... V Bank Markazi [1994] 1 AC 438 ... 15 (2) There are however points in and ... ruled that in relation to the standard of proof required before a national court was entitled to conclude that it had jurisdiction, the question was ... ...
-
Fili Shipping Company Ltd v Premium Nafta Products Ltd; Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation v Privalov
...be exercised sparingly and only for such documents as can be shown to be necessary for the fair disposal of the application; see Rome v Punjab National Bank [1989] 2 All England Reports 136. There are no reasons for concluding that any different approach is appropriate under the provisions......
Request a trial to view additional results