Ross v Fedden
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Court | Court of the Queen's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Transco Plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
...could not be established against them. (2) Blackburn J did not conceive himself to be laying down any new principle of law. When, in Ross v Fedden (1872) 26 LT 966, 968, it was later suggested to him by counsel that the question in Rylands v Fletcher had never been decided until the adjudic......
-
Cambridge Water Company v Eastern Counties Leather
...considered. Rylands v. Fletcher was indeed not regarded by Blackburn J. as a revolutionary decision: see, e.g., his observations in Ross v. Fedden (1872) 26 L.T. 966, 968. He believed himself not to be creating new law, but to be stating existing law, on the basis of existing authority; and......
-
Gore v Stannard (trading as Wyvern Tyres)
...65 L.Q.R. 480], Rylands v. Fletcher was indeed not regarded by Blackburn J. as a revolutionary decision: see, e.g., his observations in Ross v. Fedden (1872) 26 L.T. 966, 968. He believed himself not to be creating new law, but to be stating existing law, on the basis of existing authority;......
-
Prosser (A.) & Son Ltd v Levy
...been brought with the consent or for the common benefit of both parties. I need refer to no more of the cases than Carstairs v. Taylor; Ross v. Feddon, and Cockburn v. Smith. It is now settled law that where the plaintiff and. The defendant occupy parts of the same building, whether it be t......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
................ 227 Rissiter v. Miller, (1878) 3 App. cases. 1124 ................................................. 294 Ross v. Feddon, (1872) L.R. 7 Q.B. 661 ........................................................... 299 Rotterdamsche Bank v. B.O.A.C. (1935) 1 All E.R. 675. ......................