Ross v Pearson (formerly Ross)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1976 |
| Date | 1976 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Cain v. Cain, (1993) 115 Sask.R. 241 (QB)
...2 All E.R. 260 (D.C.), consd. [para. 35]. Pilcher v. Pilcher, [1956] 1 All E.R. 463 (D.C.), consd. [para. 36]. Ross v. Pearson, [1976] 1 All E.R. 790; [1976] 1 W.L.R. 224 (D.C.), consd. [para. 37]. Jones v. Jones, [1971] 3 All E.R. 1201; 115 Sol. Jo. 869 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 40]. Lewis v......
- Gomez Nee David v Gomez
-
Gomez v Gomez
...and Malaysian practice was also being applied in the Singapore courts.Light on the Pilcher and Luscombe cases is shed by Ross v Pearson [1976] 1 WLR 224; [1976] 1 All ER 790. Here, an order by magistrates for arrears of maintenance came up for review by way of case stated before the Family ......
-
Russell v Russell
...orders by case stated. 6 At the hearing on 5th September, 1984 Mr. Russell's solicitor had referred the Justices to Ross v. Pearson (1976) 1 W.L.R. 224 and invited them to remit all arrears which had accrued more than 12 months previously. The Justices stated in the relevant case that: "We ......
Request a trial to view additional results