Rottenberg and Others v Monjack and Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date25 June 1992
Date25 June 1992
CourtChancery Division

Chancery Division

Before Judge Roger Cooke

Rottenberg and Others
and
Monjack and Another

Insolvency - receiver's remuneration - disputed figure - injunction

Injunction against receiver

Where a receiver appointed by a debenture holder had paid the debenture holder in full and all that remained before the termination of the receivership was payment of his own remuneration, but the company disputed the figure claimed by the receiver for his remuneration, the company could obtain an interlocutory injunction to restrain the receiver from selling any further property pending the determination of the question of the disputed remuneration which would reveal whether there was any need to realise any further sums.

Judge Roger Cooke, sitting as a judge of the Chancery Division so held in a reserved judgment granting an interlocutory injunction on a motion by Moshe Rottenberg, Chaye Esther Rottenberg, Britknit (International) Ltd and Lounova (1982) Ltd seeking relief against Philip Monjack and Stephen Daniel Swaden, the receivers of the company plaintiffs.

Mr Peter Castle for the plaintiff companies; Mr Jonathan Arkush for the receivers.

HIS LORDSHIP said that the plaintiffs sought summary determination of an enquiry as to what the receivers of the company plaintiffs could properly charge for their remuneration and costs and for an injunction to prevent the receivers realising any further properties under their control pending that determination.

The company plaintiffs were wholly owned subsidiaries of AKLIM, a charitable company dedicated to Orthodox Jewish charities. The individual plaintiffs were husband and wife and directors of the company plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs borrowed substantial sums from First National Commercial Bank plc and a series of securities were created to secure the plaintiffs' indebtedness.

The plaintiffs were unable to keep up with their payments and the bank appointed the defendants, partners in a well known insolvency firm, as administrative receivers of the companies.

The receivers proceeded with the receivership and had managed to repay the bank in full.

In fact in doing so they had done themselves a disservice because the terms of their appointment under the debenture entitled them to be paid first. Now they only had to quantify what was properly due to them, pay themselves and bring the receivership to an end.

It was there that the conflict arose. The plaintiff said that the sums which the receivers ought properly to pay themselves...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Bula Ltd v Crowley
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 13 February 2003
    ...ACT 1911 GOMBA HOLDINGS V MINORIES FINANCE 1989 BCLC 115 MAGADI SODA CO LTD, RE 1925 41 TLR 297 ROTTENBERG & ORS V MONJACK & ANOR 1993 BCLC 374 IRISH OIL & CAKE MILLS LTD DONNELLY UNREP COSTELLO 27.03.1983 1986/6/798 ARDMORE STUDIOS (IRL) LTD V LYNCH & ORS 1965 IR 1 JOHNSON & CO (BUILDERS)......
  • Knowles v Liverpool City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 October 1993
    ...an appeal by Liverpool City Council from the dismissal by the Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Purchas and Mrs Justice Booth) (The Times July 2, 1992: (1993) ICR 21) of its appeal from Mr Recorder Briggs, who on May 30, 1991, in Liverpool County Court, awarded damages of £3,092 to Mr Raymond K......
  • Re Pearl Maintenance Services Ltd ; Re Pearl Building Contracts Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Companies Court)
    • Invalid date
  • ACC Bank Plc v Cunniffe
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 13 October 2017
    ...as primarily a device to protect the mortgagee. This primary duty to the secured creditor was referred to in Rottenberg v. Monjack [1993] B.C.L.C. 374 where Cooke J. stated at pp. 377 and 378:- ‘It is quite clear, both from these powers and the purpose for which receivers are appointed and ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Freedom of speech, permissible tailoring and transcending strict scrutiny.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 144 No. 6, June 1996
    • 1 June 1996
    ...unprotected speech); Chuck Philips, North Steamed at Ice T: He Wants Time Warner to Face Sedition Charges Over Rap Song, L.A. Times, July 2, 1992, at D1, D2 (quoting Lt. Col. Oliver North's prediction that the song will "incite violence against the men and women in blue"). (65) The prohibit......
  • Freedom of speech and speech about political candidates: the unintended consequences of three proposals.
    • United States
    • Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy Vol. 24 No. 1, September 2000
    • 22 September 2000
    ...attacks on police officers); Chuck Philips, North Steamed at Ice T; He Wants Time Warner to Face Sedition Charges over Rap Song, L.A. TIMES, July 2, 1992, at D1 (describing Lt. Col. Oliver North's suggestions to the same (24.) See Volokh, supra note 10, at 235-37; cf id. at 236 n.80 (descri......
  • ASEAN, the declaration on conduct, and the South China Sea.
    • Singapore
    • Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 25 No. 3, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...Frank Cass 2000), pp. 146-7. (13.) Tel Ming Cheung, "Fangs of the Dragon", Far Eastern Economic Review, 13 August 1992. (14.) Straits Times, 2 July 1992. (15.) Harvey Stockwin, "China's Controversial Territorial Claim", South China Morning Post, 8 March (16.) Straits Times, 28 March 1992. (......
  • Mandating negotiations to solve the NIMBY problem: a creative regulatory response.
    • United States
    • UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy Vol. 20 No. 2, December 2002
    • 22 December 2002
    ...at A3. (18.) See Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, supra note 12. (19.) Mike Ivey, Landfill Firm Rips State About-Face, CAP. TIMES, Jul. 2, 1992, at (20.) Mike Ivey, Landfill Won't Take Municipal Waste, CAP. TIMES, Oct. 12, 1992, at A3. (21.) Mike Ivey, Madison-Prairie Landfill Dea......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT