Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Roxburgh and Company v Barlas

Rettie, Crawford & Melville, Court of Session Cases (4th Series) Rettie, Crawford & Melville, Court of Session Cases (4th Series) Cited authorities 5 Cited in 1 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date08 January 1876
Date08 January 1876
Docket NumberNo. 54.
CourtCourt of Session
Court of Session
1st Division
No. 54.
Roxburgh and Co.
and
Barlas.

Process—Printing—Expenses.—

In the sequestration of Young and Armstrong, spirit- merchants, Glasgow, a claim by Roxburgh and Company, creditors, having been rejected by the trustee, Mr Barlas, they appealed to the Sheriff, and afterwards from the Sheriff to the Court of Session.

When the case was called the print of the appeal, and especially the titles of the pleadings in the Sheriff Court, as printed, were found to be so imperfect that it did not appear from the print who the respondent was.

The Court pronounced this interlocutor:—‘Having heard counsel on the note of appeal, appoint the appellants to amend the print by adding in manuscript on the margin the titles of the pleadings in the Sheriff Court, and for that purpose continue the cause till this day week: Find the appellants liable in the expenses of this...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT