Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust v Hammond (No. 3)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
Year1999
Date1999

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Co-operative Retail Services Ltd v Taylor Young partnership Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 25 April 2002
    ...liable to CRS, together with them, in respect of the same damage. In this appeal the issue does not, as in Royal Brompton Hospital National Health Service Trust v Hammond [2002] UKHL 14, relate to the identity of the damage; the issue is whether Wimpey and Hall are "liable" to CRS, because......
  • Aer Lingus v Gildacroft Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 24 June 2005
    ...Act (see also section 6) and the 1980 Limitation Act. The House of Lords in Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust v Hammond & Others (Taylor Woodrow Construction (Holdings) Limited, Part 20 defendant) [2002] 1WLR 1397 considered the meaning of the word "damage" in the context of the express......
  • Niru Battery Manufacturing Company v Milestone Trading Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 October 2003
    ... ... Lord Justice Sedley ... Case No: A3/2002/1883/1900 IN THE SUPREME COURT ... COURT Mr Justice Moore-Bick Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, ... by fraud and as an accessory to a breach of trust. In the event Mr Mahdavi has not proceeded with ... decision of the House of Lords in Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust v Hammond [2002] UKHL 14 , ... ...
  • Harry Gordon Cressman and Barbara Gordon Cressman (Personal Representatives of Thomas Ashley Cressman (Deceased) v Coy of Kensington (SALES) Ltd v Randall McDonald [CA (Civil), 05/02/2004]
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 February 2004
    ... ... Mr. Justice Wilson ... Case No: B2/2003/0885 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ... (MAYOR'S AND CITY OF LONDON COURT) Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, ... that Coys would hold any recoveries on trust for the Cressmans in diminution of any claim that ... drew a ttention to the cases of Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust v. Hammond [2002] UKHL 14 ; ... ...
  • Get Started for Free