Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation v Sjoforsakrings Aktiebolaget Vega

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1902
Date1902

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • CONTRACTUAL ILLEGALITY AND CONFLICT OF LAWS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1995, December 1995
    • 1 December 1995
    ...contractus being the system of law having the closest and most real connection with the contract is the proper law of the contract. 257 [1902] 2 K.B. 384. 258 Subject to any impact the lex fori may have on the enforceability of such contracts. See the earlier discussion under the rubric “IL......
  • The limitations of "back to back" as a concept in reinsurance in English law following Lexington v. AGF (and Lexington v. Wasa).
    • United States
    • Defense Counsel Journal Vol. 77 No. 3, July 2010
    • 1 July 2010
    ...have repeatedly held this also to be the case in reinsurance contracts, see Royal Exchange Assurance Corp v. Sjoforsakrings AB Vega (1902) 2 K.B. 384 (pre-Rome Convention) and Gan Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Tai Ping Insurance Co. Ltd. (1999) I.L.P. 729 (post-Rome (16) (1986) 2 Lloyd's Rep. 179 a......
  • ILLEGAL CONTRACT
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Judicial Dictionary of Nigerian Law. First edition I
    • 6 February 2019
    ...is not pleaded by the defendant and the parties do not desire to rely on it. See: Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation v. Vega (1902) 2 K.B. 384; Sodipo v. Lemninkainen OY (No. 2) (1986) 1 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 15) 220; (1986) 1 S.C. 197; Onyiuke III v. Okeke (1976) 10 N.S.C.C. 146 at 150." - Per F......