Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation v Sjoforsakrings Aktiebolaget Vega
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1902 |
| Year | 1902 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
- Attorney General v Lopinot Limestone Ltd
- Kannamah; Narayanan
-
Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v Butcher
... ... JUSTICE HOBHOUSE Royal Courts of Justice (Transcript of the ... ...
-
Cia Maritima San Basilio SA v Oceanus Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Ltd
...current voyage, see the Finance Act, 1901, Section 11 over-ruling Charlesworth v. Faber 5 Com. Cas. 408, andsee also Royal Exchange (1902) 2 K. B. 384. Such policies complied with Section 23(3) of the Marine Insurance Act, 1906, which required a policy to state the "period of time… covered......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
CONTRACTUAL ILLEGALITY AND CONFLICT OF LAWS
...contractus being the system of law having the closest and most real connection with the contract is the proper law of the contract. 257 [1902] 2 K.B. 384. 258 Subject to any impact the lex fori may have on the enforceability of such contracts. See the earlier discussion under the rubric “IL......
-
Table of cases
...A.R. 177, 11 C.P.C. (6th) 319, 2005 ABCA 198.................. 98 Royal Exchange Assurance Corp v. Sjoforsakrings Aktiebologet Vega, [1902] 2 K.B. 384 (C.A.) ............................................................................... 274 Royal Trust Corporation of Canada v. A.S.(W.)S. (......
-
The limitations of "back to back" as a concept in reinsurance in English law following Lexington v. AGF (and Lexington v. Wasa).
...have repeatedly held this also to be the case in reinsurance contracts, see Royal Exchange Assurance Corp v. Sjoforsakrings AB Vega (1902) 2 K.B. 384 (pre-Rome Convention) and Gan Insurance Co. Ltd. V. Tai Ping Insurance Co. Ltd. (1999) I.L.P. 729 (post-Rome (16) (1986) 2 Lloyd's Rep. 179 a......
-
ILLEGAL CONTRACT
...is not pleaded by the defendant and the parties do not desire to rely on it. See: Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation v. Vega (1902) 2 K.B. 384; Sodipo v. Lemninkainen OY (No. 2) (1986) 1 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 15) 220; (1986) 1 S.C. 197; Onyiuke III v. Okeke (1976) 10 N.S.C.C. 146 at 150." - Per F......