Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Supreme Court |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] UKSC 33 |
| Year | 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
281 cases
-
Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Nobu Su / Hsin Chi Su (aka Su Hsin Chi; aka Nobu Morimoto)
...a court order, but because, as a matter of “ ordinary rationality” (to use the language of Lord Leggatt in Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi [2021] UKSC 33, [2021] 1 WLR 3863 at [41]) a party's failure to give disclosure which they could and should have given may indicate that that party knew ......
-
Lidl Great Britain Ltd v Tesco Stores Ltd
... ... 30 Ms McEttrick was, between 2015 and 2021, the Group Brand Director for Tesco. As at the date of trial, she was no longer ... Court agreed) has recently provided clear guidance on the point in Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2021] UKSC 33 at [41]: “41. The ... ...
-
Scott Newson v The Secretary of State for Justice
...the Defendant's control and has not been provided to the Claimant or the Court, the Supreme Court held in Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2021] UKSC 33; [2021] 1 W.L.R. 3863 at para. 41 that this is a matter of ordinary rationality. Per Lord Leggatt (with whom the rest of the Supreme Court a......
-
Dunstan v Ball
...v Central Manchester Health Authority [1998] EWCA Civ 598 and reconsidered by the Supreme Court in Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi [2021] UKSC 33. In the latter case, Lord Leggatt said at paragraph 41: ‘[…] tribunals should be free to draw, or to decline to draw, inferences from the facts of t......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Passivity, Public Distancing And Prolonged Judgments
...17 Judgment/'218. 18 Judgment/'218 to 224. 19 Judgment/'229 to 232. 20 Judgment/'234 to 306. 21 Judgment/'311, applying Efobi v Royal Mail Group [2021] UKSC 33. 22 Judgment/'314 to Originally Published by ThoughtLeaders4 Competition Magazine (Issue 10) The content of this article is intende......
