Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] UKSC 33 |
| Year | 2021 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
76 cases
-
Scott Newson v The Secretary of State for Justice
...the Defendant's control and has not been provided to the Claimant or the Court, the Supreme Court held in Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2021] UKSC 33; [2021] 1 W.L.R. 3863 at para. 41 that this is a matter of ordinary rationality. Per Lord Leggatt (with whom the rest of the Supreme Court a......
-
Lidl Great Britain Ltd v Tesco Stores Ltd
... ... 30 Ms McEttrick was, between 2015 and 2021, the Group Brand Director for Tesco. As at the date of trial, she was no longer ... Court agreed) has recently provided clear guidance on the point in Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2021] UKSC 33 at [41]: “41. The ... ...
-
CJ and LK Perks Partnership v Natwest Markets Plc (formerly The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc)
...to call Ms Fullerton. 74 The Supreme Court has recently addressed the question of adverse inference in Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi [2021] UKSC 33. The Court said at paragraph [41]: “The question whether an adverse inference may be drawn from the absence of a witness is sometimes treated as......
-
Crypto Open Patent Alliance v BTC CoreCraig Steven Wright
...absence: Wisniewski v Central Manchester HA [1998] PIQR P324 at 340. As Lord Leggatt explained in Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd [2021] 1 WLR 3863 at §41, this is “ a matter of ordinary rationality” and a feature of the process of a Court drawing inferences: “So far as possible, tribunals sh......
Request a trial to view additional results