Russell v Dickson

JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date14 May 1997
Date14 May 1997
CourtCourt of Session (Outer House)

Outer House of the Court of Session

Before Mr T G Coutts, QC

Russell
and
Dickson

Scots law - judicial immunity - sheriff not liable for acting in excess of jurisdiction

Sheriff not liable for acting in excess of power

A sheriff acting as a judge of summary jurisdiction was not liable in damages for unreasonably ordering an accused man to be detained in a procedure that had been held on appeal to be incompetent.

Mr T G Coutts, QC, sitting as a temporary judge in the Outer House of the Court of Session, so held, dismissing an action of damages brought by Mr Richard Russell against Mr Robert Dickson, WS.

Mr Peter Ferguson for the pursuer; Mr Robert McCreadie for the defender.

HIS LORDSHIP said that the pursuer had appeared for trial before the defender, who was a sheriff, and had pleaded guilty to careless driving, driving with excess alcohol and failing to stop after an accident.

The defender, instead of proceeding to sentence, had adjourned the cause and remanded the pursuer in custody in order that inquiries could be made about the whole conduct of the case. As a result the pursuer had spent five days in Barlinnie Prison.

In delivering their opinion upon a bill of suspension brought by the pursuer the Criminal Appeal Court had described the defender's behaviour as having been in excess of his common law power to adjourn and the pursuer's detention as unreasonable and the proceedings thereafter as incompetent.

It was a somewhat ironic footnote to those events that the result of the defender's conduct had been that the pursuer's pleas of guilty had been quashed so that he had avoided conviction on his own pleas of guilty.

In seeking damages the pursuer averred that at the trial the defender had been in a foul temper and that the pursuer believed there to be no other reason for that than vindictiveness towards the pursuer's solicitor.

He averred that the defender had on a previous occasion demonstrated malice towards the solicitor. His counsel had argued that the sheriff's conduct could not be described as a judicial act entitling him to absolute protection. Where there was excess of jurisdiction, malice assisted to show that the sheriff had forfeited his judicial protection.

Parties were agreed that a sheriff sitting as a judge in a court of summary jurisdiction was a Queen's judge entitled to all the immunities attaching to such a judge including absolute privilege in respect of statements made in court.

The matter of judicial immunity was one of public...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 books & journal articles
  • Yamashita, Medina, and Beyond: Command Responsibility in Contemporary Military Operations
    • United States
    • Military Law Review No. 164, June 2000
    • June 1, 2000
    ...Charged for Holding Somali Over Fire, OTTAWA CITIZEN, Apr. 12, 1997, at A1; Soldiers Face Charges of Torture on UN Mission, IRISH TIMES, June 23, 1997; Robert Fox, Belgian Troops Admit to "Roasting" Somali Boy, DAILEY TELE-GRAPH LONDON, June 24, 25. The traditional and doctrinally recognize......
  • Outrageous fortune and the criminalization of mass torts.
    • United States
    • Michigan Law Review Vol. 96 No. 5, March 1998
    • March 1, 1998
    ...Lawyers Become Sultans, Wall St. J., June 27, 1997, at A14; Barry Meier, Record Legal Fees Emerge as Issue in Tobacco Deal, N.Y. Times, June 23, 1997, at All; Richard B. Schmitt, Big Winners in the Settlement Could Be the Lawyers, Wall St. J., June 23, 1997, at B1; Matthew Scully, A Modest ......
  • Liberty of expression in Ireland and the need for a constitutional law of defamation.
    • United States
    • Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Vol. 32 No. 2, March 1999
    • March 1, 1999
    ...in most circumstances. (1.) See, e.g., Michael Foley, Papers Would Not Have Risked Calling Aitken a Liar Under Irish Libel Law, IRISH TIMES, June 23, 1997, at 13, available in 1997 WL (2.) See id. (3.) See, e.g., Foley, supra note 1, at 13. (4.) See Campbell-Sharp v. Independent Newspapers ......
  • An evaluation of EIA system performance in Turkey in the context of procedural effectiveness
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law No. 13-3, November 2021
    • November 17, 2021
    ...was came into force on February 7, 1993, under the direction of the reviewers.The EIA process in Turkey has been completely amendedsix times (June 23, 1997, June 06,2002, December 16, 2003, July 17, 2008, October 03, 2013 and November 25, 2014) over thepast 27 years.Since 1993 when EIA prac......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT