Russell v Russell & Roebuck
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1957 |
| Date | 1957 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Wheeler v Wheeler
...J. and Lord Scarman applied. (15) Qureshi v. Qureshi, [1972] Fam. 173; [1971] 1 All E.R. 325, distinguished. (16) Russell v. Russell, [1957] P. 375; [1957] 1 All E.R. 929. (17) S Trust, In re, 1990-91 CILR N-24, considered. (18) Tahir v. Tahir, 1993 S.L.T. 194, considered. (19) Torok v. Tor......
-
F v F and Another
...umbrella of this section so as to make use of the argument based on reciprocity.” 11 That decision was appealed by Sachs, J. in Russell v. Russell and Roebuck [1957] 1 All E. R. 929. The result of the decision in Levett has been described by Lord Pearce in the House of Lords decision in Ind......
-
Janine Yvonne Simone Viguie (Respondent (Petitioner) v Jacques Georges Eric Viguie (Appellant (First Respondent) Gisele Kallimopoulos (Second Respondent)
...of the above-mentioned sec. 18(1) 9 The legislature has thus endorsed a situation which, as I ventured to mention in Russell v. Russell (1957 P., 375, at 382), sometimes puts the wife into a "heads I win, tails you do not" position - a situation which, in some respects, lacks attraction and......
-
L.W.E. v J.F.
...not be able to file a petition because he does not fall within the scope of Section 5 and, the husband argues on the authority of Russell v. Russell and Roebuck [1957] 1 All E.R. 929, a decision of the High Court of England, that because this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain his peti......
Request a trial to view additional results