A & S (Children) v Lancashire County Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] EWHC 1689 (Fam) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Date | 2012 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
X, Y and Z v West Sussex County Council
...interest of the child". Their roles are more fully set out within the "IRO Handbook" which provides the relevant statutory guidance. In the LancashireCase it was found that the failures of the IRO amounted to a breach of the children's rights. 52 The actions of the IRO in this case are full......
-
A City Council v DC and Others
...to in judgmentA (a child) (disclosure), Re[2012] UKSC 60, [2013] 1 FCR 69, [2012] 3 WLR 1484. A (children) (failed freeing order), Re[2012] EWHC 1689 (Fam), [2012] All ER (D) 173 B BC v S[2006] EWHC 2584 (Fam), [2007] 1 FCR 574, [2007] 1 FLR 1600. J (adoption: revocation of freeing order), ......
-
RE v North Yorkshire County Council and Others
...and profoundly serious consequences for the child, who may find himself vulnerable and isolated within the system: see A v Lancashire [2012] EWHC 1689 (Fam); [2013] 2 FLR 803. There Peter Jackson J noted that the very existence of the consultation process acts as a 'stimulus to good practic......
-
Kent County Council v M and another
...at all. The role of the IRO and the IRO service is comprehensively dealtwith by Peter Jackson J in A v Lancashire County Council [2012] EWHC 1689 (Fam); [2013] 2 FLR803, at paras 168–198. This should be required reading for all IROs.78 Judge Lazarus sets out a helpful summary of the level o......
Request a trial to view additional results