S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Order)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2002 |
| Neutral Citation | [2002] EWHC 223 (Fam) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
41 cases
-
Community Care North East v Durham County Council
...in this house, I should have thought that the ‘Liberty to apply’ would enable the court to remedy the position.” 32 Also in S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Order) [2003] Fam 1 the court had to consider the basis on which the terms of an ancillary relief order on divorce could be varied. Th......
-
Alicea Helen Birch v James William Hamilton Birch
...by the court have been surveyed by Bracewell J in Benson v Benson (Deceased) [1996] 1 FLR 692 and, more recently, in S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Order) [2002] EWHC 223 (Fam), [2003] Fam 1, [2002] 1 FLR 992. I need not repeat the exercise. It is enough for present purposes to identify......
-
Singh v Entry Clearance Officer, New Delhi
...and bought through commercial intermediaries, that I had occasion to consider in Re M [Adoption: International Adoption Trade] EWHC 219 ( Fam), [2003] 1 FLR 1111. In that case the baby was for all practical purposes waved through immigration control because it had been adopted – with judici......
-
CS v ACS and Another
...were unsatisfactory and cumbersome, yet, as she dryly observed, 'the difficulties persist'. That was in 1995. In 2002 in S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Order) [2002] EWHC 223 (Fam), [2003] Fam 1, [2002] 1 FLR 992, at para [11], the same judge observed that the law was in 'a most unsati......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Accommodating Children's Rights in a Post Human Rights Act Era
...plan) [2002] UKHL 10 [2002]2 AC 291.13 ibid at [54].14 But see Re S (adult patient) (inherentjurisdiction: familylife) [2002] EWHC 2278 (Fam)[2003] 1 FLR292, for an interesting discussion by Munby J (at [30]^[45]) of the potential con£ict of rightsbetween a father and his adult‘child’which ......