S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Order)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtFamily Division
Judgment Date2002
Neutral Citation[2002] EWHC 223 (Fam)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
40 cases
  • Bowman v Fels (Bar Council and Others intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 d2 Março d2 2005
    ...and guidance about good practice given by Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, President, in P v P (Ancillary relief: Proceeds of crime)ELR ((2003) Fam 1). Submissions The claimant's solicitors and the intelligence service submitted that the language of section 328 should be read as entirely genera......
  • The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v (First Defendant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 10 d5 Fevereiro d5 2006
    ...1 QB 358, Chanel v F.W. Woolworth & Co Ltd [1981] 1 WLR 484, Ropac Ltd v Inntrepeneur Pub Co (CPC) Ltd [2001] L&TR 10, S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Order) [2002] 3 WLR 1372, Eronat v. Tabbah [2002] EWCA Civ 950, and Di Placito v Slater [2004] 1 WLR 1605. The most helpful of these, in my......
  • Adobe Systems Inc. v Netcom Online.Company uk Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 2 d5 Março d5 2012
    ...but there is no mistake of law if the relevant law was merely in doubt. So far as consent orders are concerned, Chitty makes reference to S v S [2003] Fam 1 where it was held that a mistake of law was not a sufficient ground to set aside a consent order made in ancillary relief proceedings......
  • R (Anthony Hickmott) v Brighton and Hove Council and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 8 d5 Outubro d5 2004
    ...by the court with the consent of the parties in ancillary relief proceedings under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (e.g. S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Orders) [2002] 3 WLR 1372 (although the need for the court to make the order in that jurisdiction is a distinguishing feature of that app......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Accommodating Children's Rights in a Post Human Rights Act Era
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 69-3, May 2006
    • 1 d1 Maio d1 2006
    ...plan) [2002] UKHL 10 [2002]2 AC 291.13 ibid at [54].14 But see Re S (adult patient) (inherentjurisdiction: familylife) [2002] EWHC 2278 (Fam)[2003] 1 FLR292, for an interesting discussion by Munby J (at [30]^[45]) of the potential con£ict of rightsbetween a father and his adult‘child’which ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT