S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Order)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Family Division |
| Judgment Date | 2002 |
| Neutral Citation | [2002] EWHC 223 (Fam) |
| Date | 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
43 cases
-
Community Care North East v Durham County Council
...thought that the ‘Liberty to apply’ would enable the court to remedy the position.” 32 Also in S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Order) [2003] Fam 1 the court had to consider the basis on which the terms of an ancillary relief order on divorce could be varied. There was a consent order and B......
-
Singh v Entry Clearance Officer, New Delhi
...and bought through commercial intermediaries, that I had occasion to consider in Re M [Adoption: International Adoption Trade] EWHC 219 ( Fam), [2003] 1 FLR 1111. In that case the baby was for all practical purposes waved through immigration control because it had been adopted – with judici......
-
CB v EB
...(Trustee in Bankruptcy for Mak) v Humphreys [2005] EWHC 335 (Ch); [2005] 2 All ER 418 S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Order) [2002] EWHC 223 (Fam); [2003] Fam 1; [2002] 3 WLR 1372; [2002] 1 FLR S v S [2015] EWHC 1005 (Fam); [2015] 1 WLR 4592; [2016] 1 FLR 131 Salekipour v Parmar [2017] EWC......
-
Brennan v Bolt Burdon (A Firm) and Others
...the first one in which this question has arisen. It arose in the context of a consent order made in ancillary relief proceedings in S v S [2003] Fam 1. The parties had settled their differences and consented to an order on the basis of professional advice. Some weeks later White v. White [2......
Get Started for Free
