S Wakeman v 1) Boys & Maughan Solicitors 2) A Baker
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Judge Tayler |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Published date | 20 March 2024 |
Judgment approved by the Court for handing down Mr S. Wakeman v (1) Boys and Maughan Solicitors (2) Mr A Baker
© EAT 2024 Page 1 [2024] EAT 39
Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EAT 39
Case No: EA-2022-000253-LA
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Rolls Building
Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL
Date: 20 March 2024
Before :
HIS HONOUR JUDGE JAMES TAYLER
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between :
S WAKEMAN Appellant
- and –
(1) BOYS AND MAUGHAN SOLICITORS
(2) A BAKER Respondents
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAOMI LING (instructed through Direct Public Access) for the Appellant
TOM BROWN (instructed by Boys & Maughan Solicitors) for the Respondents
Hearing date: 28 February 2024
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JUDGMENT
Judgment approved by the Court for handing down Mr S. Wakeman v (1) Boys and Maughan Solicitors (2) Mr A Baker
© EAT 2024 Page 2 [2024] EAT 39
SUMMARY
Practice and Procedure
The Employment Tribunal erred in law in its approach to an application to vary or set aside an
Unless Order or for relief from sanction. The matter was remitted to the Employment Tribunal for
redetermination.
To continue reading
Request your trial