Saeed v Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2000 |
| Year | 2000 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Skidmore v Dartford & Gravesham NHS Trust
... ... DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2 ... Lord Justice ... In Saeed v Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust [2000] All ER (D) 2387 , the ... ...
-
Saeed v Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
...ruling on what those terms were and whether the employer was in breach of them. 15 In the present case, reported as Saeed v The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust [2000] Lloyd's Rep Med 331, Gage J preferred the approach of Lightman J. He accepted that it was a matter of contract rath......
-
R (John Botham) v Ministry of Defence
...remedy. 19. Ms O'Rourke drew attention to what Hale LJ (as she then was) had said in Saeed v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust [2000] Lloyd's Rep Med 331. This was another case (like Skidmore) where the issue arose as to what if any role the Court or Tribunal had in reviewing a Trust's decisio......
-
Skidmore v Dartford & Gravesham NHS Trust
...Appeal unanimously allowed Mr Skidmore's appeal: [2002] ICR 403. Following a recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Saeed v Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust [2001] ICR 903, Keene LJ held that the decision of the employer must comply with the terms of the contract. Keene LJ furth......