Sagar v H. Ridehalgh & Son Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1931
Date1931
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • Park Cakes Ltd v Shumba and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 July 2013
    ...story starts with two well-known cases from the earlier part of the last century — Devonald v Rosser & Sons [1906] 2 KB 723, and Sagar v Ridehalgh & Son Ltd [1931] 1 Ch 310— but they were concerned with rather different issues from the present case, and I need only review the more recent au......
  • Garratt v Mirror Group Newspapers
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 April 2011
    ...where the custom and practice relied upon was in respect of an industry (such as the weaving trade in Lancashire: see Sagar v Ridehalgh [1931] 1 Ch 310) but that the approach was different when considering an established practice within a single organisation. 27 In Duke v Reliance Systems L......
  • Evangelistic Temple v Lauriette Lightfoot
    • Bahamas
    • Court of Appeal (Bahamas)
    • 14 October 2021
    ...Group Retail Limited [2005] All ER (D) 18; applied Quinn and others v. Calder Industrial Materials Ltd, [1996] IRLR 126; mentioned Sagar v. Ridehalgh & Son, [1931] 1 Ch. 310; mentioned St. Andrew's School v. Margo Albury, IndTribApp & CAIS No. 75 of 2013; mentioned The Post Office v. Walls......
  • Mr I Phillips v Applied Corrosion Monitoring Ltd: 2405912/2022
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 4 August 2023
    ...be reasonable, notorious and certain (see, for example, Devonald v Rosser and Sons 1906 2 KB 728, CA, and Sagar v H Ridehalgh and Son Ltd 1931 1 Ch 310, This means that the custom must be fair and not arbitrary or capricious; that it must be generally established and well known; and that it......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...the salary in respect of such loss as it proves it has suffered by reason of the employee's breach (Sagar v H Ridehalgh and Son, Limited[1931] 1 Ch 310 at 325). 12.130 The Court of Appeal upheld (at [8]) the finding in the court below that Mattheus remained employed by EPL until 24 August 2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT