Sahota v Home Office and another

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Neutral CitationUKEAT/342/09
Date2010
Year2010
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Keaney vs Northern Ireland Commissioner
    • United Kingdom
    • Industrial Tribunal (NI)
    • 19 August 2011
    ...note the more limited view taken of the ECJs decision in Mayr, by the EAT in Sahota v Home Office and Pipkin [2009] UKEAT/0342/09/LA, [2010] ICR 772, in which it was held that a complaint of direct sex discrimination by reason of IVF treatment would only arise in the interval between the re......
  • Ms A Ginger v Department of Work and Pensions: 3401940/2015
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 19 April 2017
    ...Thus a refusal to employ a woman because she was pregnant amounted to direct sex discrimination. 13 In the case of Sahota v Home Office [2010] ICR 772, the Employment Appeal Tribunal, dismissing an appeal against findings of the Employment Tribunal, considered the case of Mayr and (per stat......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT