Salaman v Secretary of State for India in Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1906 |
| Year | 1906 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
43 cases
-
Godman v Winterton
...for the correctness of the procedure in the present case, it would be found in Salaman v. Secretary of State in Council of IndiaELR ([1906] 1 K.B. 613), where an action was similarly In the present case the Court of Appeal, in the exercise of its inherent jurisdiction, had looked at the evi......
- PP Persero Sdn Bhd v Bimacom Property & Development Sdn Bhd
- Bimacom Property & Development Sdn Bhd; PP Persero Sdn Bhd
- Wan Salimah Wan Jaffar v Mahmood Omar; Anim Abdul Aziz (Intervener)
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
STATE INCAPACITY AND SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY
...168 US 250 at 252 (1897). 67Attorney-General v Nissan[1970] AV 179 at 237. 68 See Salaman v Secretary of State in Council of India[1906] 1 KB 613. 69 See J Gillis Wetter, “Pleas of Sovereign Immunity and Act of Sovereignty before International Arbitral Tribunals”(1985) 2 J Int'l Arb 7 at 18......
-
Arbitration
...defined as a conduct ‘done in the exercise of the State's supreme sovereign power’ (see Salaman v Secretary of State in Council of India[1906] 1 KB 613 at 613 and 639) and not a private dealing. The right is ascertainable by the nature of the transaction rather than the stature of the entit......
-
Implementation of Treaties in Nigeria and the Status Question: Whither Nigerian Courts?
...court can take cognisance of it; it will remain an obligation between independent states. In Salaman v. Secretary of State for India,3636(1906) 1 KB 613, 639. Fletcher Moulton L.J., affirmed that municipal courts, ‘do not administer treaty obligations between independent states’. Cap. A9, c......