Sammes Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1792 |
| Date | 01 January 1792 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 80 E.R. 593
COURT OF WARDS, AND OTHER COURTS AT WESTMINSTER
tein. 7 jacobi regis. sammes cask. * John Sammes being seised of a Grange Mead, to him and his heirs by copy of court roll, according to the custom of the mannor of Tolleshunt Major, holden of the King in capite,of which maiiuor, Sir Thomas Beckingham Knight was seised in fee. Sir Thomas Beckingham by deed indented, dated 22 of December, anno regni Regis Jacobi primo, made between him on the one part, and the said John Samms and George Samms, son and heir apparent on the other part, in consideration of a certain competent summe of English money, unto the said Sir Thomas, by the said John Samms paid, did bargain, sell, grant, enfeoffe, release, and confirm unto the said John Samms, the said mead, called Grange Mead, to have and to hold the said mead, called Grange Mead, unto the said John Sammes, and George Sammes, their heirs and assignes for ever, and by the same deed, it is covenanted as followeth : and the said Sir Thomas Beckingham, for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigties, and every of them, doth further covenant, promise, and grant, to and with the said John Samms, and George Samms, their heirs and assigties, and every of them, that ha the said Sir Thomas Beckingham and his heirs, shall and will, from time to time, and at all times hereafter, during the space of ten years next coming, after the date hereof, at the reasonable request, and at the proper cost and charges of the said John Sammes and George Sammes, or either of them, or of their heirs and assignes, or one of them, make, do, suffer, acknowledge and execute, or cause to be made, done, suffered, acknowledged, or executed, all and every such further act and acts, thing and things, devise and devises, in the law whatsoever; for the further and better assurance, surety, sure making, conveying and assuring of the above herein recited, and hereby mentioned to be bargained premisses, with their, and every of their appurtenances unto the said John Samms and George Samms, their heirs and assignes, according to the intent and [12] meaning of these presents, be it by fine, feoffment, deed, or deeds inrolled or not inrolled, the inrolment of these presents, recovey with single or double voucher, or vouchers, release, confirmation with warranty, or warranties, against them the said Sir Thomas Beckingham, and his heirs, or without warranty, as by the aaid John Sammes and George...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gordon v Calvert
...was not the surety to have the same liberty to discharge himself from his liability1? (Comes Ranelagh v. Hayes, 1 Vern. 190). Wright v. Man-ley (11 Ves. 12), Wright v. Simpson (6 Ves. 714). The case of Shepherd v. Needier (2 P. W. 288) will be cited for the Defendants. But that case is dist......
-
Between J. E. Stamper, Widow, Plaintiff; and Samuel Barker, Clerk, and Robert Baas (Executors of Samuel Barker, the surviving Executor of Samuel Barker, the Testator in the Pleadings named), Elizabeth Sanneville (the Wife of Abraham Sanneville, to whom, jointly with the Plaintiff, Administration had been granted, with the Will annexed, of David Stamper, the late Husband of the Plaintiff), and David Brown and Eliza Brown, Legatees under the Will of the said David Stamper, deceased, Defendants
...bankrupt's wife; and seemed of opinion that the wife had a claim even against a purchaser fora valuable consideration; and in Wright v. Mm'ley (11 Ves. 17), the same Judge held the same doctrine. In Woollands v. Croucher (12 Ves. 174), there is a mistake in the marginal note, which represen......
-
The King v The Bishop of Ely
...pour le Roij: Co. Ent. 434 or 474. Dr. Reeve's case. Vaugh. Rep. 118. Glover's case, q' ne fuit innovation, mes prerogative al common ley. 11 H. 4, 37. Eolle, Presentment, 343. Vaugh. Eep. Dr. Yeedy's case, Cro. Eliz. 790. 11 H. 4, 60. Noy, 138. Dy. 228. 11 H. 4, 66. Moor, 399. The Judges s......
-
73 ER 442
...101 "' ^n a" P'nts allowed for sufficient, and indifferent to pass, only for Dy. 245 a. Be"1-33- 7. Jac. In Cur' Wardorum. Samin's case [Ley. 11. 13. Co. 54.] by the two Chief Justices and the Chief Baron, that in this case if a feoffment be made to a husband to the use of the husband and w......
-
Legislación aplicable
...producida por los Residuos de las industrias del dióxido de titanio. (BOE nº 102, de 29/04/1991) Envases y Residuos de Envases. · Ley 11/1997, de 24/04/1997, de envases y residuos de envases. (BOE nº 99, de · Real Decreto 782/1998, de 30/04/1998, por el que se aprueba el Reglamento para el ......
-
Matrimonio y conviviencia en pareja en el derecho español
...BONA núm. 82, de 7-7-2000. [768] Ley 1/2001 de 6 de abril por la que se regulan las uniones de hecho. DOGV núm.3978 de 11-4-2001. [769] Ley 11/2001 de 19 de diciembre de Uniones de hecho de la Comunidad de Madrid. BOCM núm.2 de 3-1-2002. [770] Ley 18/2001 de 19 de diciembre de Parejas estab......
-
La jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa en España
...a una construcción doctrinal cuyos orígenes se encuentran en el proceso codificador español (desde el Anteproyecto de García Goyena a la Ley 11 de mayo de 1888). En concreto la Base 10, a, dispuso la inclusión en el Código civil de "La bases en que descansan los conceptos especiales de dete......
-
La protección jurídica del medio ambiente y su proyección en el ámbito fiscal
...radioactivos210. Impuesto sobre depósito de residuos peligrosos211. A estos cuatro “impuestos ecológicos” se sumó en 2010, por obra de la Ley 11/2010, de 3 de diciembre, de medidas fiscales para la reducción del déficit público y para la sostenibilidad, el Impuesto sobre las bolsas Page 118......