Sammes Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1792 |
| Date | 01 January 1792 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 80 E.R. 593
COURT OF WARDS, AND OTHER COURTS AT WESTMINSTER
tein. 7 jacobi regis. sammes cask. * John Sammes being seised of a Grange Mead, to him and his heirs by copy of court roll, according to the custom of the mannor of Tolleshunt Major, holden of the King in capite,of which maiiuor, Sir Thomas Beckingham Knight was seised in fee. Sir Thomas Beckingham by deed indented, dated 22 of December, anno regni Regis Jacobi primo, made between him on the one part, and the said John Samms and George Samms, son and heir apparent on the other part, in consideration of a certain competent summe of English money, unto the said Sir Thomas, by the said John Samms paid, did bargain, sell, grant, enfeoffe, release, and confirm unto the said John Samms, the said mead, called Grange Mead, to have and to hold the said mead, called Grange Mead, unto the said John Sammes, and George Sammes, their heirs and assignes for ever, and by the same deed, it is covenanted as followeth : and the said Sir Thomas Beckingham, for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigties, and every of them, doth further covenant, promise, and grant, to and with the said John Samms, and George Samms, their heirs and assigties, and every of them, that ha the said Sir Thomas Beckingham and his heirs, shall and will, from time to time, and at all times hereafter, during the space of ten years next coming, after the date hereof, at the reasonable request, and at the proper cost and charges of the said John Sammes and George Sammes, or either of them, or of their heirs and assignes, or one of them, make, do, suffer, acknowledge and execute, or cause to be made, done, suffered, acknowledged, or executed, all and every such further act and acts, thing and things, devise and devises, in the law whatsoever; for the further and better assurance, surety, sure making, conveying and assuring of the above herein recited, and hereby mentioned to be bargained premisses, with their, and every of their appurtenances unto the said John Samms and George Samms, their heirs and assignes, according to the intent and [12] meaning of these presents, be it by fine, feoffment, deed, or deeds inrolled or not inrolled, the inrolment of these presents, recovey with single or double voucher, or vouchers, release, confirmation with warranty, or warranties, against them the said Sir Thomas Beckingham, and his heirs, or without warranty, as by the aaid John Sammes and George...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gordon v Calvert
...was not the surety to have the same liberty to discharge himself from his liability1? (Comes Ranelagh v. Hayes, 1 Vern. 190). Wright v. Man-ley (11 Ves. 12), Wright v. Simpson (6 Ves. 714). The case of Shepherd v. Needier (2 P. W. 288) will be cited for the Defendants. But that case is dist......
-
Between J. E. Stamper, Widow, Plaintiff; and Samuel Barker, Clerk, and Robert Baas (Executors of Samuel Barker, the surviving Executor of Samuel Barker, the Testator in the Pleadings named), Elizabeth Sanneville (the Wife of Abraham Sanneville, to whom, jointly with the Plaintiff, Administration had been granted, with the Will annexed, of David Stamper, the late Husband of the Plaintiff), and David Brown and Eliza Brown, Legatees under the Will of the said David Stamper, deceased, Defendants
...bankrupt's wife; and seemed of opinion that the wife had a claim even against a purchaser fora valuable consideration; and in Wright v. Mm'ley (11 Ves. 17), the same Judge held the same doctrine. In Woollands v. Croucher (12 Ves. 174), there is a mistake in the marginal note, which represen......
-
The King v The Bishop of Ely
...pour le Roij: Co. Ent. 434 or 474. Dr. Reeve's case. Vaugh. Rep. 118. Glover's case, q' ne fuit innovation, mes prerogative al common ley. 11 H. 4, 37. Eolle, Presentment, 343. Vaugh. Eep. Dr. Yeedy's case, Cro. Eliz. 790. 11 H. 4, 60. Noy, 138. Dy. 228. 11 H. 4, 66. Moor, 399. The Judges s......
-
73 ER 442
...101 "' ^n a" P'nts allowed for sufficient, and indifferent to pass, only for Dy. 245 a. Be"1-33- 7. Jac. In Cur' Wardorum. Samin's case [Ley. 11. 13. Co. 54.] by the two Chief Justices and the Chief Baron, that in this case if a feoffment be made to a husband to the use of the husband and w......