Sandell

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date06 January 1993
Date06 January 1993
CourtValue Added Tax Tribunal

VAT Tribunal

Sandell

Assessment - Best of commissioners' judgment - Fraudulent gold supplies - Manufactured invoices produced to further conspiracy - Assessment raised to recover amount equal to input tax claimed - Whether commissioners entitled to assess amount claimed as due to taxpayer - Whether entitled to recover amount equal to that shown as tax - Value Added Tax Act 1983 schedule 7 subsec-or-para 4 schedule 7 subsec-or-para 4 schedule 7 subsec-or-para 6 schedule 7 subsec-or-para 6Value Added Tax Act 1983, Sch. 7, para. 4(1) and (2) and 6(2) and (3).

The issue was whether an assessment designed to recover input tax credited to the appellant and shown in sham invoices for fictitious gold purchases by him was effective.

The appellant was part of a criminal conspiracy to defraud Customs of VAT due on gold supplies. Mr H, the alleged central figure in the conspiracy, set up a chain of purported suppliers and caused a quantity of gold to be smuggled into the UK. The aim was that "missing traders" with false addresses issued invoices to the appellant who issued invoices to a Mr C who issued invoices to Mr H's company, Dollarleague Ltd, with bogus invoices issued with the purpose of claiming input tax down the chain. At the end of the chain, Dollarleague would reclaim input tax which had never been paid out and make an otherwise genuine sale of smuggled gold to legitimate traders, accounting for output tax thereon.

The fraudulent operation started in mid-1989 and the appellant's 8/89 quarterly return showed a small amount repayable to him. This alerted the computer at Southend and an investigation ensued. The 11/89 return showed £505,686 of output and £498,177 of input tax.

On 11 January 1990 the appellant was arrested and charged and was subsequently sentenced to imprisonment upon a guilty plea. Mr H, on the other hand, pleaded not guilty and was acquitted.

Customs assessed the appellant to the amount of input tax shown in the 11/89 return, although the form VAT 100 actually showed a net amount of tax for the period as being due to them. No assessment was raised in relation to Mr H. The commissioners contended that they were entitled to assess an amount equivalent to the input tax claimed in an assessment issued to the best of their judgment. Under Value Added Tax Act 1983 schedule 7 subsec-or-para 6para. 6(2) of Sch. 7 they were entitled to recover an amount shown as tax on an invoice as a debt due to the Crown whether or not the supply to which it related had taken place.

The appellant who did not appear at, nor was represented before, the tribunal simply stated in his grounds of appeal that the assessment was wrong because, while it was based on the disallowance of falsely stated input tax, it took no account of falsely stated output tax.

Held, allowing the taxpayer's appeal:

1. There was no statutory provision under the taxing legislation which deemed a sham supply to be a taxable supply and consequently none of the fictitious sales of gold by the appellant came within the charge to tax under Value Added Tax Act 1983 section 2sec. 2.

2. A sham invoice purporting to evidence the making of a taxable supply was a nullity and neither gave rise to a charge to output tax nor established a claim for input tax credit. Therefore both the inputs and the outputs in the return for period 11/89 were to be disregarded.

3. The amount of £472,120 shown in the assessment as being due to the commissioners could not be assessed as an amount due under any "best judgment"...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • The University of Huddersfield Higher Education Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Value Added Tax Tribunal
    • 16 d3 Outubro d3 2002
    ...BVC 428 Ramsay (WT) Ltd v IR Commrs ELR[1982] AC 300 Rompelman v Minister van Financiën VAT(Case 268/83) (1985) 2 BVC 200,157 Sandell VAT[1993] BVC 788 Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Shipping and Forwarding Enterprise Safe BV VAT(Case 320/88) [1991] BVC 119 Van Boeckel v C & E Commrs VAT(......
  • RBS Property Developments Ltd; v Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Value Added Tax Tribunal
    • 1 d3 Janeiro d3 2003
    ...C-367/96) [1998] ECR I-2843 Naturally Yours Cosmetics Ltd v C & E Commrs (No. 2) VAT(Case 230/87) (1988) 3 BVC 428 Sandell VATNo. 9665; [1993] BVC 788 Westmoreland Investments Ltd v MacNiven (HMIT) TAX[2001] BTC 44 WHA Ltd VATNo. 17,605; [2002] BVC 4061 Liability to tax - Construction of bu......
  • Tariq
    • United Kingdom
    • First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
    • 22 d4 Outubro d4 2009
    ...person had no knowledge and no means of knowledge.... 53. An example of a supply vitiated by fraud is the decision in Sandell No. 9665; [1993] BVC 788. In that case both the buyer and seller knew that the transactions and invoices were shams aimed to recover input tax which had not been pai......
  • McNulty Offshore Services Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Value Added Tax Tribunal
    • 4 d5 Abril d5 1997
    ...BVC 2412 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists VAT(MAN/96/967) No. 14,558; [1997] BVC 2083 Sandell VAT(LON/91/1000) No. 9665; [1993] BVC 788 Securicor Granley Systems Ltd VAT(LON/89/695) No. 4575; (1990) 5 BVC 580 Tourick (RM) & Co VAT(LON/91/1938) No. 7712; [1992] BVC 825 Asses......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT