Sansom v Peay
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1976 |
| Date | 1976 |
| Year | 1976 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 cases
-
Goodwin v Curtis (Inspector of Taxes)
...by the taxpayer not as a residence but as mere temporary accommodation. Adopting the approach of Mr Justice Brightman in Sansom v PeayWLR ([1976] 1 WLR 1073, 1077) that Parliament's intention was "to exempt from liability to capital gains tax the proceeds of sale of a person's home", the co......
-
Ursa Ventures Ltd. v. Edmonton (City), 2016 ABCA 135
...Dickson, J.; Lenz v. Sculptoreanu , 2016 ABCA 111, ¶ 4 ("A court may never [give the text an implausible meaning]"); Sansom v. Peay , [1976] 3 All E.R. 375, 379 (Ch. D.) ("it would not be permissible for me to construe sub-s (9) in a manner which I thought was fair or reasonable unless the ......
-
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs v Desmond Higgins
... ... The purpose of ... main residence relief was correctly identified by the FTT at [6(2)] of its decision by ... reference to Sansom v Peay [1976] 1 WLR 1073 at p1077 B-C where Brightman J ... “The general scheme of section 29 [as it then was] is to exempt from liability to ... ...
-
Jodrey Estate v. Province of Nova Scotia and Attorneys General of British Columbia and Quebec, (1980) 32 N.R. 275 (SCC)
...1, consd. [para. 87]. Corporation of the City of Toronto v. John Russell, [1908] A.C. 493, consd. [para. 93]. Sansom et al. v. Peay, [1976] 3 All E.R. 375, consd. [para. Re J. Bibby & Sons Ltd. Pensions Trust Deed, Davies v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, [1952] 2 All E.R. 483, consd. [p......
Get Started for Free