Sassoon (E. D.) & Company v Western Assurance Company
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 17 May 1912 |
| Date | 17 May 1912 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
Seashore Marine SA v Phoenix Assurance Plc [QBD (Comm)]
...by Ince & Co) for the defendants. The following cases were referred to in the judgment: Sassoon (E D) & Co v Western Assurance CoELR [1912] AC 561. Lloyd (J J) Instruments Ltd v Northern Star Insurance Co Ltd (“The Miss Jay Jay”)UNK [1987] 1 Ll Rep 32. Mountain v WhittleELR [1921] 1 AC 615.......
-
Versloot Dredging BV and Another v HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG and Others
...AC 431; and it excludes cases where the casualty is inevitable, as where there is a rotten hulk or "debilitated" vessel: E.D. Sassoon & Co v Western Assurance Company [1912] AC 33 I shall have to return to the concepts of fortuity and debilitated vessels in due course. It is important to n......
-
Global Process Systems Inc. and Another v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Berhad (The "Cendor MOPU")
...431, the direction of Mr. Justice Lush approved by the Court of Common Pleas; Ballantyne v. Mackinnon, [1896] 2 Q.B., 455; Sassoon v. Western Assurance Co. [1912] A.C. 561. Finally, as to the requirement that a loss by perils of the seas shall be “fortuitous”. There may be philosophical pr......
-
Global Process Systems Inc. and Another v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Berhad (The "Cendor MOPU")
...section, there is no reason to suppose that it bears a different meaning from that in section 39: E D Sassoon & Co v Western Assurance Co [1912] AC 561. 42 Under the 1906 Act therefore, the fact that the goods are not reasonably fit in all respects to encounter the ordinary perils of the se......
Request a trial to view additional results