Satnam Investments Ltd v Dunlop Heywood & Company Ltd and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
- Kuan Pek Seng @ Alan Kuan v Robert Doran
-
Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Andrew Joseph Ruhan
...account of profits when it is satisfied that to do so would be a disproportionate response to the breach of fiduciary duty: Satnam Investments Ltd v Dunlop Heywood [1999] 3 All ER 652. iii) Whilst, at least on the basis of the authorities as they stand (Mr Ruhan reserving his position at a......
-
Kenneth Davies v Stephen Ford
...of choses in action, for example the benefit of a contract with a third party, or a debt. d. Lewison J also noted that, in SATNAM INVESTMENTS LTD V. DUNLOP HEYWOOD [1999] 3 ALL ER 652, the Court of Appeal was prepared to assume that confidential information could count as trust property. e......
-
Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation and 75 ors. v Yuri Privalov and 28 ors
...378 p.392G. Mr. Berry disputed this, citing the decision of the Court of Appeal in Satnam Investments Ltd. v Dunlop Heywood & Co Ltd., [1999] 1 BCLC 385, 404, and the decision of David Steel J in Petrotrade Inv v Smith, [2000] 1 Lloyd's Rep 486 at pp. 491–2. In particular, in the Satnam ca......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
'The receipt of what?': Questions concerning third party recipient liability in equity and unjust enrichment.
...ACSR 285, 303. (157) [1974] 1 NSWLR 443, 469-70. (158) Ibid 470. (159) Indeed, in Satnam Investments Ltd v Dunlop Heywood & Co Ltd [1999] 3 All ER 652 ('Satnam'), the Court of Appeal rejected the extension of Boardman [1967] 2 AC 46 in this way: at 671 (Nourse LJ). Thus, the receipt of ......